[jira] [Commented] (MNG-7595) [REGRESSION] $pom.-expressions in remote pom cause warnings

["Michael Osipov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17631235#comment-17631235 ] 

Michael Osipov commented on MNG-7595:
-------------------------------------

I don't think so. If we need to reconsider then we will not be able to remove anything. These I have seen also and those have been deprecated around 10+ years.

> [REGRESSION] $pom.-expressions in remote pom cause warnings
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-7595
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7595
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-2
>            Reporter: Robert Scholte
>            Priority: Major
>
> When depending on [wagon-http-1.0-beta-6|https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/wagon/wagon-http/1.0-beta-6/wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom] you'll get a warning like:
> {noformat}
> [WARNING] The POM for org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:jar:1.0-beta-6 is invalid, transitive dependencies (if any) will not be available: 1 problem was encountered while building the effective model for C:\Users\rober\.m2\repository\org\apache\maven\wagon\wagon-http\1.0-beta-6\wagon-http-1.0-beta-6.pom
> [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.groupId' for ${pom.groupId}:wagon-http-shared:jar with value '${pom.groupId}' does not match a valid coordinate id pattern. @ org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-http:1.0-beta-6
> {noformat}
> Even though this is an old artifact, IMO we should not have such a warning for remote poms, as they cannot be changed. So the question is: do we need to reconsider the decision to only allow $project.-expressions for the build-pom?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)