You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/12/03 17:54:09 UTC
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Andrew,
the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
(created in r599998)
I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
(and the *real* trunk,
to merge the "new" features in.
-Matthias
PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
"two trunks" idea, at this point.
On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> the "1.2-x trunk"
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> >
> > -M
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Andrew-
> > > >
> > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > -1: 0
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > >
> > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > following:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > >
> > > > > Opinions?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > supported.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad-impl/1.2.5-SNAPSHOT/
Awesome!
Thanks,
Andrew
On Dec 7, 2007 12:19 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Great news!
>
> I just added the trunk_1.2.x to continuum and started the build
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 3:43 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Okay, the 1.2.x is building fine. Any status on the continuum / maven
> > snapshot deployment status?
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2007 10:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > let's share the work;
> > >
> > > I do 2)
> > > and you 1.b)
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > The new trunk is up
> > > >
> > > > svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
> > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
> > > >
> > > > Committed revision 600997.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Now we need to:
> > > >
> > > > 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
> > > > a) committer's responsibility
> > > > b) one person doing large merge
> > > > 2. set up nightly builds from this URL
> > > >
> > > > I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
> > > >
> > > > -Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Andrew,
> > > > >
> > > > > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> > > > > (created in r599998)
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> > > > > (and the *real* trunk,
> > > > > to merge the "new" features in.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> > > > > "two trunks" idea, at this point.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Andrew,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > > > > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > > > > > the "1.2-x trunk"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -M
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Andrew-
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > > > > > following:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Great news!
I just added the trunk_1.2.x to continuum and started the build
-Matthias
On Dec 7, 2007 3:43 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay, the 1.2.x is building fine. Any status on the continuum / maven
> snapshot deployment status?
>
> -Andrew
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 10:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > let's share the work;
> >
> > I do 2)
> > and you 1.b)
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> > On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The new trunk is up
> > >
> > > svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
> > >
> > > Committed revision 600997.
> > >
> > >
> > > Now we need to:
> > >
> > > 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
> > > a) committer's responsibility
> > > b) one person doing large merge
> > > 2. set up nightly builds from this URL
> > >
> > > I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
> > >
> > > -Andrew
> > >
> > >
> > > On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
> > > >
> > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> > > > (created in r599998)
> > > >
> > > > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> > > > (and the *real* trunk,
> > > > to merge the "new" features in.
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> > > > "two trunks" idea, at this point.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Andrew,
> > > > >
> > > > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > > > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > > > > the "1.2-x trunk"
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -M
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Andrew-
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > > > > following:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Okay, the 1.2.x is building fine. Any status on the continuum / maven
snapshot deployment status?
-Andrew
On Dec 4, 2007 10:01 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> let's share the work;
>
> I do 2)
> and you 1.b)
>
> :-)
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The new trunk is up
> >
> > svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
> >
> > Committed revision 600997.
> >
> >
> > Now we need to:
> >
> > 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
> > a) committer's responsibility
> > b) one person doing large merge
> > 2. set up nightly builds from this URL
> >
> > I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
> > >
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> > > (created in r599998)
> > >
> > > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> > > (and the *real* trunk,
> > > to merge the "new" features in.
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> > > "two trunks" idea, at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > > > the "1.2-x trunk"
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > > > following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
On Dec 4, 2007 10:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> are you also updating the version number ?
> to 1.2.5-SNAPSHOT ?
Yes
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
are you also updating the version number ?
to 1.2.5-SNAPSHOT ?
-M
On Dec 4, 2007 6:01 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> let's share the work;
>
> I do 2)
> and you 1.b)
>
> :-)
>
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The new trunk is up
> >
> > svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
> >
> > Committed revision 600997.
> >
> >
> > Now we need to:
> >
> > 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
> > a) committer's responsibility
> > b) one person doing large merge
> > 2. set up nightly builds from this URL
> >
> > I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> >
> > On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
> > >
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> > > (created in r599998)
> > >
> > > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> > > (and the *real* trunk,
> > > to merge the "new" features in.
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> > > "two trunks" idea, at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > > > the "1.2-x trunk"
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > -M
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > > > following:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
let's share the work;
I do 2)
and you 1.b)
:-)
On Dec 4, 2007 5:59 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The new trunk is up
>
> svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
>
> Committed revision 600997.
>
>
> Now we need to:
>
> 1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
> a) committer's responsibility
> b) one person doing large merge
> 2. set up nightly builds from this URL
>
> I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
>
> -Andrew
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> > (created in r599998)
> >
> > I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> > (and the *real* trunk,
> > to merge the "new" features in.
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> > "two trunks" idea, at this point.
> >
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Andrew,
> > >
> > > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > > the "1.2-x trunk"
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > > >
> > > > -M
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Andrew-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > > following:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > >
> > > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > >
> > > > further stuff:
> > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
Re: [Trinidad: VOTE] 1.2 current again
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
The new trunk is up
svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x
Committed revision 600997.
Now we need to:
1. decide how to get changes from 1.0.5 over
a) committer's responsibility
b) one person doing large merge
2. set up nightly builds from this URL
I am converting the pom versions in that new URL now.
-Andrew
On Dec 3, 2007 9:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> the TAG for the 1.2.4 release is done.
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-1.2.4/
> (created in r599998)
>
> I'd suggest to use that revision as the base for the "1.2_X-trunk"
> (and the *real* trunk,
> to merge the "new" features in.
>
> -Matthias
>
> PS: so, it is pretty close to a 1.2.4, but that shouldn't stop the
> "two trunks" idea, at this point.
>
>
> On Nov 30, 2007 8:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > today the plugins 1.2.5 will be out, I'll include them into the 1.2.4 CORE
> > and I suggest to use the TAG for 1.2.4 (after the release is out), to create
> > the "1.2-x trunk"
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007 6:59 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > ok, my 1.2.4 will arrive on the weekend, or close to it.
> > >
> > > -M
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2007 6:55 PM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I was waiting on the 1.2.4 release and a response from Jeanne
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > Andrew-
> > > > >
> > > > > any plans to start on this?
> > > > > I am about to provide the 1.2.4 release bits.
> > > > > Perhaps, it is not a bad idea, to have the *restructuring* done after that ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 20, 2007 5:12 AM, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Summary of the vote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1: 8
> > > > > > 0: 0 (Matt altered his vote)
> > > > > > -1: 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 votes:
> > > > > > Andrew Robinson
> > > > > > Grant Smith
> > > > > > Martin Marinschek
> > > > > > Scott O'Bryan
> > > > > > Jeanne Waldman
> > > > > > Matt Cooper
> > > > > > Gary Kind
> > > > > > Simon Lessard
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jeanne,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since you handled the last 1.2.4 trunk creation and merge, could you
> > > > > > chime in with how this would be best handled? I was thinking of the
> > > > > > following:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) update the WIKI with the new rule that committers are responsible
> > > > > > for maintaining their changes in both the trunk and the 1.2 trunk.
> > > > > > 2) when 1.2.4 is released:
> > > > > > 2a) tag the trunk (1.0.5) to label a cut off point
> > > > > > 2b) branch trunk_1.2.x from the 1.2.4 branch
> > > > > > 3) perform "ubermerge" from 1.0.5 inception to the tag
> > > > > > 4) inform committers that they must apply any trunk changes post-tag
> > > > > > to the 1.2 trunk and any changes going forward to both if applicable
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Opinions?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/15/07, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Vote:
> > > > > > > Creation of https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Justification:
> > > > > > > Once again trinidad lacking a trunk for 1.2 is giving me heartburn.
> > > > > > > I have been making changes to 1.0.5 and to be nice, I wanted to put
> > > > > > > them into 1.2 as well, but of course there is no home for 1.2.5 yet.
> > > > > > > Unlike the last time this was brought up, we now have an existing
> > > > > > > example as an argument to use as a standard:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/trunk_1.2.x/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If it is good enough for core, should it not also be good enough for trinidad?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since "https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/" would
> > > > > > > remain untouched, this should remove any debates over JSF not being
> > > > > > > supported.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Benefits:
> > > > > > > 1) 1.2 snapshots possible with continuum
> > > > > > > 2) 1.2 is kept up to date
> > > > > > > 3) easier merge during 1.2 release time and hopefully as a result a
> > > > > > > more stable product
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Andrew
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > >
> > > > > further stuff:
> > > > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > further stuff:
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>