You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Duo Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/13 08:05:41 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15484) Correct the semantic of batch and
partial
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15863309#comment-15863309 ]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15484:
-----------------------------------
Let's restart this issue as now the isPartial is renamed to mayHaveMoreCellsInRow?
> Correct the semantic of batch and partial
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-15484
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15484
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0, 1.1.3
> Reporter: Phil Yang
> Assignee: Phil Yang
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-15484-v1.patch, HBASE-15484-v2.patch, HBASE-15484-v3.patch, HBASE-15484-v4.patch
>
>
> Follow-up to HBASE-15325, as discussed, the meaning of setBatch and setAllowPartialResults should not be same. We should not regard setBatch as setAllowPartialResults.
> And isPartial should be define accurately.
> (Considering getBatch==MaxInt if we don't setBatch.) If result.rawcells.length<scan.getBatch && result is not the last part of this row, isPartial==true, otherwise isPartial == false. So if user don't setAllowPartialResults(true), isPartial should always be false.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)