You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by mv...@comcast.net on 2010/10/22 20:40:49 UTC
Using a newer version of sfl4j
Is there any negative impact to using a newer version of slf4j than 1.5.8 with Karaf 2.0.0?
v/r,
Mike Van
Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Fwiw, Karaf uses pax-logging which provides ths slf4j api.
Unfortunately, I think slf4j 1.5 and 1.6 are slightly incompatible
IIRC, so not sure how to deal with that. What does slf4j 1.6 api
bring ?
On Friday, October 22, 2010, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please post karaf related questions to karaf mailing lists: http://karaf.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:40, <mv...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any negative impact to using a newer version of slf4j than 1.5.8 with Karaf 2.0.0?
>
>
>
> v/r,
>
>
>
> Mike Van
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
> ------------------------
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com
>
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 10/22/10 14:52, mvangeertruy@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Didnt' want to cross-post. Karaf rides on Felix 3.x. Are you sure this isnt' a Felix-related question?
The Felix framework doesn't use sfl4j.
-> richard
>
>
> Mike Van
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Guillaume Nodet"<gn...@gmail.com>
> To: users@felix.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:36:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
>
> Please post karaf related questions to karaf mailing lists:
> http://karaf.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:40,<mv...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Is there any negative impact to using a newer version of slf4j than 1.5.8
>> with Karaf 2.0.0?
>>
>>
>>
>> v/r,
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Van
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
Posted by mv...@comcast.net.
Didnt' want to cross-post. Karaf rides on Felix 3.x. Are you sure this isnt' a Felix-related question?
Mike Van
----- Original Message -----
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
To: users@felix.apache.org
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 4:36:43 PM
Subject: Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
Please post karaf related questions to karaf mailing lists:
http://karaf.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:40, <mv...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any negative impact to using a newer version of slf4j than 1.5.8
> with Karaf 2.0.0?
>
>
>
> v/r,
>
>
>
> Mike Van
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com
Re: Using a newer version of sfl4j
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Please post karaf related questions to karaf mailing lists:
http://karaf.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 20:40, <mv...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Is there any negative impact to using a newer version of slf4j than 1.5.8
> with Karaf 2.0.0?
>
>
>
> v/r,
>
>
>
> Mike Van
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
------------------------
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com