You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Jacob S. Barrett (JIRA)" <di...@incubator.apache.org> on 2005/06/14 18:00:54 UTC
[jira] Updated: (DIR-112) The implementation of LdapName#getSuffix(int) does not match that of Java 1.5's LDAP.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-112?page=all ]
Jacob S. Barrett updated DIR-112:
---------------------------------
Attachment: NameTest.java
Tests Apaching's LdapName against Sun's LdapName for consitency. Depends on Java 1.5.
> The implementation of LdapName#getSuffix(int) does not match that of Java 1.5's LDAP.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIR-112
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIR-112
> Project: Directory
> Type: Bug
> Components: General
> Reporter: Jacob S. Barrett
> Assignee: Alex Karasulu
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: NameTest.java, name-prefix-suffix.patch
>
> The attached patch fixes the LdapName#getSuffix(int) method to match the one on Java 1.5. The current getSuffix returns a prefix of sorts, but not exactly that of getPrefix. This patch also contains fixes for all (hopefully) places where getSuffix(int) was called. It also corrects the JUnit test. I have also attached a JUnit test that must be compiled and run under Java 1.5 to make sure the naming classes behave the same as Java 1.5's version.
> This patch does NOT change the ContextPartion's concet of suffix even though it is really a prefix. So it is called a suffix still, but it is really the prefix.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira