You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net> on 2007/01/02 16:27:58 UTC
Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery
Brett Porter a écrit :
> Hi Jesse,
>
> I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good
> feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
>
> It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are you
> able to help get that applied and work through some of the limitations?
>
> I'm pretty keen to see this one land :)
Me too, and it will be fix CONTINUUM-1098
Emmanuel
Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
yes, it will be the easiest solution, but in future we'll can resolve them too if we search in the database the project with the scm url (svn_url_of current_pom/module_path), if it doesn't exist, we
checkout the module and add it in continuum.
Brett Porter a écrit :
> fair enough, as long as we have sensible, pre-emptive error messages
> (perhaps just a warning that module X was ignored due to invalid path).
>
> On 04/01/2007, at 12:57 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>> Yes, we can use, it seems to be good but it won't work for modules
>> with a relative path like ../mymodule
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> Brett Porter a écrit :
>>> Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
>>> On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Brett Porter a écrit :
>>>>> Hi Jesse,
>>>>> I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a
>>>>> good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
>>>>> It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are
>>>>> you able to help get that applied and work through some of the
>>>>> limitations?
>>>>> I'm pretty keen to see this one land :)
>>>>
>>>> Me too, and it will be fix CONTINUUM-1098
>>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>>
>
>
>
Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
fair enough, as long as we have sensible, pre-emptive error messages
(perhaps just a warning that module X was ignored due to invalid path).
On 04/01/2007, at 12:57 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Yes, we can use, it seems to be good but it won't work for modules
> with a relative path like ../mymodule
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
>> Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
>> On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Brett Porter a écrit :
>>>> Hi Jesse,
>>>> I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a
>>>> good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
>>>> It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around?
>>>> Are you able to help get that applied and work through some of
>>>> the limitations?
>>>> I'm pretty keen to see this one land :)
>>>
>>> Me too, and it will be fix CONTINUUM-1098
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Yes, we can use, it seems to be good but it won't work for modules with a relative path like ../mymodule
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
> Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
>
> On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Brett Porter a écrit :
>>> Hi Jesse,
>>> I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a good
>>> feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
>>> It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around? Are
>>> you able to help get that applied and work through some of the
>>> limitations?
>>> I'm pretty keen to see this one land :)
>>
>> Me too, and it will be fix CONTINUUM-1098
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>
>
>
Re: CONTINUUM-798: module discovery
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Great - can the patch be used as a starting point?
On 03/01/2007, at 2:27 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
>> Hi Jesse,
>> I see you took this one a couple of months ago. It looks like a
>> good feature - is the patch a good enough start to use for now?
>> It was submitted by John Didion - John, are you hanging around?
>> Are you able to help get that applied and work through some of the
>> limitations?
>> I'm pretty keen to see this one land :)
>
> Me too, and it will be fix CONTINUUM-1098
>
> Emmanuel
>