You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to alois-dev@incubator.apache.org by Flavio Pellanda <fl...@logintas.ch> on 2010/12/05 12:49:29 UTC
December Report
Hi,
i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
sure. Ulerch?
Cheers, Flavio
Re: December Report
Posted by Urs Lerch <ma...@ulerch.net>.
Hi Flavio,
I'll take a look at it, already have planned it.
Best,
Urs
Am Sonntag, den 05.12.2010, 13:49 +0100 schrieb Flavio Pellanda:
> Hi,
>
> i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
> Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
> sure. Ulerch?
>
> Cheers, Flavio
>
Re: December Report
Posted by Flavio Pellanda <fl...@logintas.ch>.
Ok, I added the desired titles. Is there anything I should add as "Any
issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of"?
On 12/05/2010 06:52 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
> I'd also like to request that we explicitly add these these entries to the
> report, to make it easier for those reading the report to know we are
> providing the information requested:
>
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation.
> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> * How has the community developed since the last report
> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> The 'No community yet' note in the report covers the third bullet, but
> please add these and add the 'no community yet' under the third entry.
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Flavio Pellanda <flavio.pellanda@logintas.ch
>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the debian packages are no official release yet. We used them for our
>> demo server and for testing.
>>
>> Since not all dependencies are available in the official debian
>> repositories, it's not sure if it will go into the official debian
>> releases. So, I think there is no need to follow the guidelines at the
>> moment - maybe there won't be a Debian package in future.
>>
>> Best, Flavio
>>
>> On 12/05/2010 02:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> Hello guys,
>>> whats behind the debian package? Is this an official release? In this
>>> case we need to follow the apache guidelines. Maybe you can explain it
>>> a bit to me :-)
>>> CHeers
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Flavio Pellanda
>>> <fl...@logintas.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
>>>> Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
>>>> sure. Ulerch?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers, Flavio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: December Report
Posted by Scott Deboy <sc...@gmail.com>.
I'd also like to request that we explicitly add these these entries to the
report, to make it easier for those reading the report to know we are
providing the information requested:
* A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
graduation.
* Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
* How has the community developed since the last report
* How has the project developed since the last report.
The 'No community yet' note in the report covers the third bullet, but
please add these and add the 'no community yet' under the third entry.
Thanks
Scott
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Flavio Pellanda <flavio.pellanda@logintas.ch
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the debian packages are no official release yet. We used them for our
> demo server and for testing.
>
> Since not all dependencies are available in the official debian
> repositories, it's not sure if it will go into the official debian
> releases. So, I think there is no need to follow the guidelines at the
> moment - maybe there won't be a Debian package in future.
>
> Best, Flavio
>
> On 12/05/2010 02:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> > whats behind the debian package? Is this an official release? In this
> > case we need to follow the apache guidelines. Maybe you can explain it
> > a bit to me :-)
> > CHeers
> > Christian
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Flavio Pellanda
> > <fl...@logintas.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
> >> Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
> >> sure. Ulerch?
> >>
> >> Cheers, Flavio
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: December Report
Posted by Flavio Pellanda <fl...@logintas.ch>.
Hi,
the debian packages are no official release yet. We used them for our
demo server and for testing.
Since not all dependencies are available in the official debian
repositories, it's not sure if it will go into the official debian
releases. So, I think there is no need to follow the guidelines at the
moment - maybe there won't be a Debian package in future.
Best, Flavio
On 12/05/2010 02:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello guys,
> whats behind the debian package? Is this an official release? In this
> case we need to follow the apache guidelines. Maybe you can explain it
> a bit to me :-)
> CHeers
> Christian
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Flavio Pellanda
> <fl...@logintas.ch> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
>> Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
>> sure. Ulerch?
>>
>> Cheers, Flavio
>>
>>
>
>
>
structure of svn-repository (Was: December Report)
Posted by Urs Lerch <ma...@ulerch.net>.
Hi all,
In addition to Christian's note I would like to discuss the structure of
the repository. I'm nearly finished with the project website now, so
these files will be added to the repository today or tomorrow as well.
And I don't think to put it all in one main directory "trunk" is a good
idea. Furthermore, I find it confusing to have the debian-directory on
the same level as the rest of the code.
Surfing through some other incubator projects, I can't find a common
sense in structuring the repository. At least when it comes to the
trunk. I think this means that we shall be free to define our own
structure. I therefore propose to add an additional folder level in the
"trunk"-directory. As first level directories I see at the moment
"ALOIS", "website" and "distros".
Discussion is open, vote (our first!) should follow soon.
Best,
Urs
Am Sonntag, den 05.12.2010, 14:57 +0100 schrieb Christian Grobmeier:
> Hello guys,
> whats behind the debian package? Is this an official release? In this
> case we need to follow the apache guidelines. Maybe you can explain it
> a bit to me :-)
> CHeers
> Christian
>
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Flavio Pellanda
> <fl...@logintas.ch> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
> > Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
> > sure. Ulerch?
> >
> > Cheers, Flavio
> >
>
>
>
Re: December Report
Posted by Christian Grobmeier <gr...@gmail.com>.
Hello guys,
whats behind the debian package? Is this an official release? In this
case we need to follow the apache guidelines. Maybe you can explain it
a bit to me :-)
CHeers
Christian
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Flavio Pellanda
<fl...@logintas.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i added our report to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2010.
> Maybe someone should check the "important issues to be done" I was not
> sure. Ulerch?
>
> Cheers, Flavio
>
--
http://www.grobmeier.de