You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com> on 2007/09/04 17:38:19 UTC
Re: Finishing relative svn:externals
Karl Fogel wrote:
> Christopher Key <cj...@cam.ac.uk> writes:
>> I was just wondering whether it might make more sense to instead
>> construct repository root relatives paths as,
>>
>> ^/branches/1.4.x
>>
>> It certainly seems to more intuitive to me. '^' is a directory, just
>> as are '..', '.' and '~', and paths relative to them are constructed
>> as '../path', './path', '~/path', so why not treat '^' the same?
>
> +1, I too think this would be more consistent.
>
> -Karl
Sounds good. We'll go with that.
Regards,
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Finishing relative svn:externals
Posted by Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>.
Yes, it will be.
Regards,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac, Ph.D.
<bl...@orcaware.com>
Subversion training, consulting and support
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/
masaru tsuchiyama wrote:
> Will "relative svn:externals" be implemented before branching 1.5.x ?
>
> Regards.
> Masaru
>
> 2007/9/5, Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>:
>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>> Christopher Key <cj...@cam.ac.uk> writes:
>>>> I was just wondering whether it might make more sense to instead
>>>> construct repository root relatives paths as,
>>>>
>>>> ^/branches/1.4.x
>>>>
>>>> It certainly seems to more intuitive to me. '^' is a directory, just
>>>> as are '..', '.' and '~', and paths relative to them are constructed
>>>> as '../path', './path', '~/path', so why not treat '^' the same?
>>> +1, I too think this would be more consistent.
>>>
>>> -Karl
>> Sounds good. We'll go with that.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Finishing relative svn:externals
Posted by masaru tsuchiyama <m....@gmail.com>.
Will "relative svn:externals" be implemented before branching 1.5.x ?
Regards.
Masaru
2007/9/5, Blair Zajac <bl...@orcaware.com>:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Christopher Key <cj...@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> >> I was just wondering whether it might make more sense to instead
> >> construct repository root relatives paths as,
> >>
> >> ^/branches/1.4.x
> >>
> >> It certainly seems to more intuitive to me. '^' is a directory, just
> >> as are '..', '.' and '~', and paths relative to them are constructed
> >> as '../path', './path', '~/path', so why not treat '^' the same?
> >
> > +1, I too think this would be more consistent.
> >
> > -Karl
>
> Sounds good. We'll go with that.
>
> Regards,
> Blair
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org