You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Rose Beck <ro...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/03 09:09:38 UTC
Query regarding Jena versions
Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
its ability to
handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
were they introduced After Apache.
--
With Warm Regards,
Rose
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
try also:
"No support"
All fixes have gone into the development line of Jena; I can't see it as
likely that anyone would put effort into bug-fix versions of the 2.7.x
generation. The 2.6.x can't be released via Apache - the code was Ip
cleared and released as 2.7.x - it would need an SF, non-Apache release.
In practice, you are on your own for diagnosing and backporting any
fixes or improvements for 2.6.x (e.g. standards alignment for standards
written after a version of Jena was released).
Andy
On 03/04/15 19:06, Rose Beck wrote:
> Oh...thanks a lot..God bless you..now I can convince my boss that
> since Jena 2.6.4 does not support N-Quads therefore we should move to
> Jena 2.13.0
>
> Also I found here
> (http://www.rpmseek.com/rpm/jena-2.6.4-5.fc18.noarch.html?hl=com&cs=icu4j:RE:0:0:0:0:0:9914798)
> that Jena supports "Reading and writing RDF in RDF/XML, N3 and
> N-Triples" (..and not n-quads). This gives me enough evidence to
> convince my boss that Jena 2.6.4 does not support N-Quad.
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 03/04/15 18:47, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>
>>> I came across the following:
>>>
>>> dice:~> /usr/share/java/jena/bin/rdfcat --help
>>> Usage: java jena.rdfcat (option|input)*
>>> Concatenates the contents of zero or more input RDF documents.
>>> Options: -out N3 | N-TRIPLE | RDF/XML | RDF/XML-ABBREV
>>> -n expect subsequent inputs in N3 syntax
>>> -x expect subsequent inputs in RDF/XML syntax
>>> -t expect subsequent inputs in N-TRIPLE syntax
>>> -[no]include include rdfs:seeAlso and owl:imports
>>> input can be filename, URL, or - for stdin
>>> Recognised aliases for -n are: -n3 -ttl or -N3
>>> Recognised aliases for -x are: -xml -rdf or -rdfxml
>>> Recognised aliases for -t are: -ntriple
>>> Output format aliases: x, xml or rdf for RDF/XML, n, n3 or ttl for N3,
>>> t or ntriple for N-TRIPLE
>>> See the Javadoc for jena.rdfcat for additional details.
>>>
>>> Does this mean Jena 2.6.x did not support .nq format? Please confirm
>>> as this will help me convince my boss to upgrade Jena
>>
>>
>> rdfcat did not support N-Quads.
>>
>> Nowadays, (2.13.0) "riot" provides a much better rdfcat facility, including
>> streaming for large data.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Looking at the code ...
>>>>
>>>> org.openjena.riot.RiotReader
>>>>
>>>> exists. This is not the way that Jena now does this. There was a
>>>> deprecate
>>>> migration cycle to move RDFDataMgr.
>>>>
>>>> Integration into model.read(, "") was not available.
>>>>
>>>> so you'll be going down a legacy blind alley
>>>>
>>>> You will have to use the source code to understand 2.6.4 so i tis very
>>>> likely to be cheaper in the long, and not so long, run to upgrade.
>>>>
>>>> (There is no RDB layer any more.)
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 03/04/15 17:45, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
>>>>> not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
>>>>> 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>>>>>>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>>>>>>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version
>>>>>>>>> "before
>>>>>>>>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> its ability to
>>>>>>>>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>>>>>>>>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>>>>>>>> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> RIOT
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and later but just in parallel development.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> With Warm Regards,
>>>>>>> Rose
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Rose Beck <ro...@gmail.com>.
Oh...thanks a lot..God bless you..now I can convince my boss that
since Jena 2.6.4 does not support N-Quads therefore we should move to
Jena 2.13.0
Also I found here
(http://www.rpmseek.com/rpm/jena-2.6.4-5.fc18.noarch.html?hl=com&cs=icu4j:RE:0:0:0:0:0:9914798)
that Jena supports "Reading and writing RDF in RDF/XML, N3 and
N-Triples" (..and not n-quads). This gives me enough evidence to
convince my boss that Jena 2.6.4 does not support N-Quad.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/15 18:47, Rose Beck wrote:
>>
>> I came across the following:
>>
>> dice:~> /usr/share/java/jena/bin/rdfcat --help
>> Usage: java jena.rdfcat (option|input)*
>> Concatenates the contents of zero or more input RDF documents.
>> Options: -out N3 | N-TRIPLE | RDF/XML | RDF/XML-ABBREV
>> -n expect subsequent inputs in N3 syntax
>> -x expect subsequent inputs in RDF/XML syntax
>> -t expect subsequent inputs in N-TRIPLE syntax
>> -[no]include include rdfs:seeAlso and owl:imports
>> input can be filename, URL, or - for stdin
>> Recognised aliases for -n are: -n3 -ttl or -N3
>> Recognised aliases for -x are: -xml -rdf or -rdfxml
>> Recognised aliases for -t are: -ntriple
>> Output format aliases: x, xml or rdf for RDF/XML, n, n3 or ttl for N3,
>> t or ntriple for N-TRIPLE
>> See the Javadoc for jena.rdfcat for additional details.
>>
>> Does this mean Jena 2.6.x did not support .nq format? Please confirm
>> as this will help me convince my boss to upgrade Jena
>
>
> rdfcat did not support N-Quads.
>
> Nowadays, (2.13.0) "riot" provides a much better rdfcat facility, including
> streaming for large data.
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking at the code ...
>>>
>>> org.openjena.riot.RiotReader
>>>
>>> exists. This is not the way that Jena now does this. There was a
>>> deprecate
>>> migration cycle to move RDFDataMgr.
>>>
>>> Integration into model.read(, "") was not available.
>>>
>>> so you'll be going down a legacy blind alley
>>>
>>> You will have to use the source code to understand 2.6.4 so i tis very
>>> likely to be cheaper in the long, and not so long, run to upgrade.
>>>
>>> (There is no RDB layer any more.)
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/04/15 17:45, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
>>>> not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
>>>> 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
>>>>> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>>>>>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>>>>>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version
>>>>>>>> "before
>>>>>>>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> its ability to
>>>>>>>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>>>>>>>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>>>>>>> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> RIOT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and later but just in parallel development.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> With Warm Regards,
>>>>>> Rose
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
With Warm Regards,
Rose
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 03/04/15 18:47, Rose Beck wrote:
> I came across the following:
>
> dice:~> /usr/share/java/jena/bin/rdfcat --help
> Usage: java jena.rdfcat (option|input)*
> Concatenates the contents of zero or more input RDF documents.
> Options: -out N3 | N-TRIPLE | RDF/XML | RDF/XML-ABBREV
> -n expect subsequent inputs in N3 syntax
> -x expect subsequent inputs in RDF/XML syntax
> -t expect subsequent inputs in N-TRIPLE syntax
> -[no]include include rdfs:seeAlso and owl:imports
> input can be filename, URL, or - for stdin
> Recognised aliases for -n are: -n3 -ttl or -N3
> Recognised aliases for -x are: -xml -rdf or -rdfxml
> Recognised aliases for -t are: -ntriple
> Output format aliases: x, xml or rdf for RDF/XML, n, n3 or ttl for N3,
> t or ntriple for N-TRIPLE
> See the Javadoc for jena.rdfcat for additional details.
>
> Does this mean Jena 2.6.x did not support .nq format? Please confirm
> as this will help me convince my boss to upgrade Jena
rdfcat did not support N-Quads.
Nowadays, (2.13.0) "riot" provides a much better rdfcat facility,
including streaming for large data.
Andy
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Looking at the code ...
>>
>> org.openjena.riot.RiotReader
>>
>> exists. This is not the way that Jena now does this. There was a deprecate
>> migration cycle to move RDFDataMgr.
>>
>> Integration into model.read(, "") was not available.
>>
>> so you'll be going down a legacy blind alley
>>
>> You will have to use the source code to understand 2.6.4 so i tis very
>> likely to be cheaper in the long, and not so long, run to upgrade.
>>
>> (There is no RDB layer any more.)
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/04/15 17:45, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
>>> not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
>>> 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>>>>
>>>> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>>>>
>>>> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
>>>> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>>>>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>>>>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version
>>>>>>> "before
>>>>>>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
>>>>>>> its ability to
>>>>>>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>>>>>>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>>>>>> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
>>>>>
>>>>> RIOT
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that
>>>>>
>>>>> time
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and later but just in parallel development.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> With Warm Regards,
>>>>> Rose
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Rose Beck <ro...@gmail.com>.
I came across the following:
dice:~> /usr/share/java/jena/bin/rdfcat --help
Usage: java jena.rdfcat (option|input)*
Concatenates the contents of zero or more input RDF documents.
Options: -out N3 | N-TRIPLE | RDF/XML | RDF/XML-ABBREV
-n expect subsequent inputs in N3 syntax
-x expect subsequent inputs in RDF/XML syntax
-t expect subsequent inputs in N-TRIPLE syntax
-[no]include include rdfs:seeAlso and owl:imports
input can be filename, URL, or - for stdin
Recognised aliases for -n are: -n3 -ttl or -N3
Recognised aliases for -x are: -xml -rdf or -rdfxml
Recognised aliases for -t are: -ntriple
Output format aliases: x, xml or rdf for RDF/XML, n, n3 or ttl for N3,
t or ntriple for N-TRIPLE
See the Javadoc for jena.rdfcat for additional details.
Does this mean Jena 2.6.x did not support .nq format? Please confirm
as this will help me convince my boss to upgrade Jena
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looking at the code ...
>
> org.openjena.riot.RiotReader
>
> exists. This is not the way that Jena now does this. There was a deprecate
> migration cycle to move RDFDataMgr.
>
> Integration into model.read(, "") was not available.
>
> so you'll be going down a legacy blind alley
>
> You will have to use the source code to understand 2.6.4 so i tis very
> likely to be cheaper in the long, and not so long, run to upgrade.
>
> (There is no RDB layer any more.)
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> On 03/04/15 17:45, Rose Beck wrote:
>>
>> Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
>> not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
>> 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>>>
>>> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>>>
>>> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
>>> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>>>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>>>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version
>>>>>> "before
>>>>>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
>>>>>> its ability to
>>>>>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>>>>>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>>>>> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>>>>>
>>>>> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
>>>>
>>>> RIOT
>>>>>
>>>>> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that
>>>>
>>>> time
>>>>>
>>>>> and later but just in parallel development.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With Warm Regards,
>>>> Rose
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
With Warm Regards,
Rose
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Looking at the code ...
org.openjena.riot.RiotReader
exists. This is not the way that Jena now does this. There was a
deprecate migration cycle to move RDFDataMgr.
Integration into model.read(, "") was not available.
so you'll be going down a legacy blind alley
You will have to use the source code to understand 2.6.4 so i tis very
likely to be cheaper in the long, and not so long, run to upgrade.
(There is no RDB layer any more.)
Andy
On 03/04/15 17:45, Rose Beck wrote:
> Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
> not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
> 2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>>
>> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>>
>> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
>> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
>>>>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
>>>>> its ability to
>>>>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>>>>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>>>> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>>>>
>>>> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
>>> RIOT
>>>> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that
>>> time
>>>> and later but just in parallel development.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With Warm Regards,
>>> Rose
>>>
>
>
>
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Rose Beck <ro...@gmail.com>.
Yes, our company has an old project built on it. So if Jena 2.6.x does
not support n-quads then i can convince my managers to move to Jena
2.13.0. Else unfortunately i have to stick to jena 2.6.4
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
>
> See http://jena.apache.org/download/
>
> Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
> On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
>> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
>> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
>> >> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
>> >> its ability to
>> >> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>> >> were they introduced After Apache.
>> >>
>> >
>> > There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
>> > SourceForge->Apache migration.
>> >
>> > N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
>> RIOT
>> > (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that
>> time
>> > and later but just in parallel development.
>> >
>> > Andy
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With Warm Regards,
>> Rose
>>
--
With Warm Regards,
Rose
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org>.
We generally recommend using the latest Jena, which now is 2.13.0.
See http://jena.apache.org/download/
Is there any particular reason why you are considering using 2.6.4?
On 3 Apr 2015 17:10, "Rose Beck" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
> it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
> help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
>
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
> >>
> >> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
> >> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
> >> its ability to
> >> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
> >> were they introduced After Apache.
> >>
> >
> > There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
> > SourceForge->Apache migration.
> >
> > N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
> RIOT
> > (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that
> time
> > and later but just in parallel development.
> >
> > Andy
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With Warm Regards,
> Rose
>
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Rose Beck <ro...@gmail.com>.
I downloaded Jena 2.6.4 today but I was not able to load n-quads in
it. Can you please confirm if Jena 2.6.4 had N-Quad feature? This will
help me figure out if I am going wrong somewhere
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
>>
>> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
>> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
>> its ability to
>> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
>> were they introduced After Apache.
>>
>
> There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
> SourceForge->Apache migration.
>
> N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in RIOT
> (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about that time
> and later but just in parallel development.
>
> Andy
>
--
With Warm Regards,
Rose
Re: Query regarding Jena versions
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 03/04/15 08:09, Rose Beck wrote:
> Just out of curiosity what is difference between Jena's version "before
> Apache" like Jena 2.6.4 and "After Apache". Is it something to do with
> its ability to
> handle n-quads..I mean were quad stores introduced before Apache or
> were they introduced After Apache.
>
There was no formal feature jump from 2.6.x to 2.7.x which is the
SourceForge->Apache migration.
N-quads, SPARQL 1.1 finalization, and the new, efficient I/O handing in
RIOT (so syntaxes except RDF/XML (and TriX)), was happening from about
that time and later but just in parallel development.
Andy