HBase 0.90.4

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

Hi,
When I tried to answer questions on 'Errors after major compaction' thread,
I realized that there is a lag between 0.90.3 and what would be in 0.90.4

Specifically, HBASE-3789 is in TRUNK and has gone through testing at SU.
I think we should integrate that into 0.90 branch and try releasing 0.90.4

To a lesser extent, HBASE-4010 should help as well.

TestFromClientSide is failing on Jenkins due to environment issue. But it
passes on Linux box for me.
I am running test suite with HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch
included<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482830/HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch>

Please comment.

Re: HBase 0.90.4

[Stack <st...@duboce.net>]

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Specifically, HBASE-3789 is in TRUNK and has gone through testing at SU.
> I think we should integrate that into 0.90 branch and try releasing 0.90.4
>

Its been deployed on a test cluster only -- IIRC -- but we can't
deploy it widely at SU because it breaks rolling restart (can't add it
to 0.90 branch for that reason either I'd say).

> TestFromClientSide is failing on Jenkins due to environment issue. But it
> passes on Linux box for me.

Yeah.  Apache infrastructure fixed the build box issue last night (A
0.90 passed this morning.  Yeah!).

We need to push out a 0.90.4.  We should fix the two blockers though first.

St.Ack

Re: HBase 0.90.4

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

>> Would you like to be RM for 0.90.4 Ted
Oops I guess that was implied.

If so, I propose bringing in HBASE-4010 and HBASE-3789

J-D / Stack:
I assume HBASE-3789 has been tested at SU.

Cheers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Would you like to be RM for 0.90.4 Ted? +1 on that too.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>   - Andy
>
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)

Re: HBase 0.90.4

[Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>]

+1

Would you like to be RM for 0.90.4 Ted? +1 on that too.
 
Best regards,


  - Andy


Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)

Re: HBase 0.90.4

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

37 bug fixes have accumulated for 0.90.4, not including HBASE-3789

FYI

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> TestZooKeeper failed in the test suite.
> It passed when executed standalone.
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> When I tried to answer questions on 'Errors after major compaction'
>> thread, I realized that there is a lag between 0.90.3 and what would be in
>> 0.90.4
>>
>> Specifically, HBASE-3789 is in TRUNK and has gone through testing at SU.
>> I think we should integrate that into 0.90 branch and try releasing 0.90.4
>>
>> To a lesser extent, HBASE-4010 should help as well.
>>
>> TestFromClientSide is failing on Jenkins due to environment issue. But it
>> passes on Linux box for me.
>> I am running test suite with HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch included<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482830/HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch>
>>
>> Please comment.
>>
>
>

Re: HBase 0.90.4

[Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>]

TestZooKeeper failed in the test suite.
It passed when executed standalone.

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> When I tried to answer questions on 'Errors after major compaction'
> thread, I realized that there is a lag between 0.90.3 and what would be in
> 0.90.4
>
> Specifically, HBASE-3789 is in TRUNK and has gone through testing at SU.
> I think we should integrate that into 0.90 branch and try releasing 0.90.4
>
> To a lesser extent, HBASE-4010 should help as well.
>
> TestFromClientSide is failing on Jenkins due to environment issue. But it
> passes on Linux box for me.
> I am running test suite with HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch included<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12482830/HBASE-3789-v4-0.90.patch>
>
> Please comment.
>