Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>]

Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
>> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
>> love to see it!
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> +1
>>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd like
>>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot of
>>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build, most of
>>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
>>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases. Thanks a lot
>>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
>>>>
>>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a good
>>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we don't have
>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release and push
>>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
>>>>
>>>> -Flavio

Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Camille Fournier <cf...@renttherunway.com>]

Sorry :)


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> ... and if we could hold 3.4.7 jiras for now, I would appreciate it.
>
> -Flavio
>
> On 19 Feb 2014, at 01:25, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > I have started the process but I haven't had a solid block of time to do
> it. I'll be producing an rc soon, though.
> >
> > -Flavio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:21 AM, Camille Fournier <
> camille@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> C
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <camille@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <
> michi@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <
> michi@cs.stanford.edu>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
> >>>>>> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows
> work,
> >>>>>> love to see it!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <
> camille@apache.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <
> fpjunqueira@yahoo.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833.
> I'd
> >>>> like
> >>>>>>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a
> lot
> >>>> of
> >>>>>>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build,
> >>>> most of
> >>>>>>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
> >>>>>>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases.
> >>>> Thanks a lot
> >>>>>>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds
> like a
> >>>> good
> >>>>>>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
> >>>> don't have
> >>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
> >>>> and push
> >>>>>>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -Flavio
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com>]

... and if we could hold 3.4.7 jiras for now, I would appreciate it.

-Flavio

On 19 Feb 2014, at 01:25, Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I have started the process but I haven't had a solid block of time to do it. I'll be producing an rc soon, though.
> 
> -Flavio
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:21 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> C
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>wrote:
>> 
>>> Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
>>>>>> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
>>>>>> love to see it!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd
>>>> like
>>>>>>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot
>>>> of
>>>>>>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build,
>>>> most of
>>>>>>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
>>>>>>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases.
>>>> Thanks a lot
>>>>>>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a
>>>> good
>>>>>>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
>>>> don't have
>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
>>>> and push
>>>>>>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Flavio
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Flavio Junqueira <fp...@yahoo.com>]

I have started the process but I haven't had a solid block of time to do it. I'll be producing an rc soon, though.

-Flavio




On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:21 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
 
Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut?
>
>Thanks,
>C
>
>
>
>On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:
>>
>>> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
>>> >> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
>>> >> love to see it!
>>> >>
>>> >> Patrick
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> +1
>>> >>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd
>>> like
>>> >>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot
>>> of
>>> >>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build,
>>> most of
>>> >>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
>>> >>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases.
>>> Thanks a lot
>>> >>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a
>>> good
>>> >>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
>>> don't have
>>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
>>> and push
>>> >>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>]

Any updates? Are we comfortable getting this cut?

Thanks,
C


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>wrote:

> Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:
>
>> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
>> >> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
>> >> love to see it!
>> >>
>> >> Patrick
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>> +1
>> >>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd
>> like
>> >>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot
>> of
>> >>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build,
>> most of
>> >>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
>> >>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases.
>> Thanks a lot
>> >>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a
>> good
>> >>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
>> don't have
>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
>> and push
>> >>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Flavio
>>
>
>

Re: Status of 3.4.6

[Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>]

Yeah I think we should put a bullet in this.


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>wrote:

> Should we move ZOOKEEPER-1833 to 3.4.7 now and get 3.4.6 out?
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <mi...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> +1, great idea re setting a deadline now that we're close (keep in
> >> mind we an always do further fix releases). Kudos on the windows work,
> >> love to see it!
> >>
> >> Patrick
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Camille Fournier <ca...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>> On Jan 11, 2014 10:18 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <fp...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> We only have one blocker for 3.4.6 now which is ZOOKEEPER-1833. I'd
> like
> >>>> to get the windows build to pass on jenkins, and we have made a lot of
> >>>> progress already. Although we have focused on the windows build, most
> of
> >>>> the changes were small bugs that don't manifest as easily in other
> >>>> platforms, so it has been a chance to clean up the test cases. Thanks
> a lot
> >>>> for the great community work, Germán, Rakesh, Michi et al.
> >>>>
> >>>> To avoid postponing the 3.4.6 release even further, it sounds like a
> good
> >>>> idea to put a deadline on ZOOKEEPER-1833. I would say that if we
> don't have
> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1833 done by the end of January, we should cut a release
> and push
> >>>> some of the work to 3.4.7. Any concern here?
> >>>>
> >>>> -Flavio
>