Re: [doc] Proposal to move 10.0 doc files from derby/site to derby/docs [Last call for objections]

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>]

Later today I intend to work on moving the 10.0 docs from derby/site to 
derby/docs with Andrew's modifications.

If anybody objects, please speak up now.

  -jean


Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> Just a couple of comments...
> 
> On 5/10/05, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> 
>>a) Since the original files will no longer be integrated with the
>>current web site, users won't see "Home" and "Community" tabs on each
>>page; instead, they'll see a tab that takes them to the main derby site.
> 
> 
> Looks good, better than my hack job with the doc set that went out
> with the 10.0.2.1 release. :-)
> 
> 
>>2) What are the actual steps to implement this change?
>>
>>a) Initialize a new forrest site under
>>svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/derby/docs/trunk/10.0
> 
> 
> This should be svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/derby/docs/branches/10.0
> to keep it separate from the DITA source.
> 
> 
>>b) svn move the subdirectories from
>>derby/site/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals to
>>derby/docs/trunk/10.0/src/documentation/content/xdocs/manuals
> 
> 
> As above, into docs/branches instead of docs/trunk.
> 
> 
>>d) Create symbolic links on minotaur.apache.org between the old location
>>and the new so URLs in old email and Jira entries will still work.
> 
> 
> I'm curious if these links will be properly synced over to
> www.apache.org. I'm guessing that they will, as long as rsync's link
> options are turned on for the sync, but we'll see.
> 
> andrew

Re: [doc] Proposal to move 10.0 doc files from derby/site to derby/docs [Last call for objections]

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>]

Just keep in mind that derby/docs/branches/10.0 just has doc source. The 
pages built from that source are not committed to the svn repo. --This 
is how other apache projects handle forrest-generated stuff.

  -jean


Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On 5/14/05, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> 
>>This change is in place and the web site changes are live on
>>incubator.apache.org/derby . From my poking, it seems stable. Please
>>report any problems.
> 
> 
> Now that we have a real 10.0 doc branch, should I remove the doc set
> that's included in the 10.0 code branch? Or should I update it with a
> build from the 10.0 doc branch? The 10.0 branch isn't seeing much
> action, but I suppose it might be useful to have a set of docs checked
> in somewhere in case there happens to be a need to make a 10.0 release
> sometime in the future.
> 
> Anyone have an opinion on this?
> 
> andrew

Re: [doc] Proposal to move 10.0 doc files from derby/site to derby/docs [Last call for objections]

[Andrew McIntyre <mc...@gmail.com>]

On 5/14/05, Jean T. Anderson <jt...@bristowhill.com> wrote:
> This change is in place and the web site changes are live on
> incubator.apache.org/derby . From my poking, it seems stable. Please
> report any problems.

Now that we have a real 10.0 doc branch, should I remove the doc set
that's included in the 10.0 code branch? Or should I update it with a
build from the 10.0 doc branch? The 10.0 branch isn't seeing much
action, but I suppose it might be useful to have a set of docs checked
in somewhere in case there happens to be a need to make a 10.0 release
sometime in the future.

Anyone have an opinion on this?

andrew

Re: [doc] Proposal to move 10.0 doc files from derby/site to derby/docs [Last call for objections]

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>]

Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> Later today I intend to work on moving the 10.0 docs from derby/site to 
> derby/docs with Andrew's modifications.
> 
> If anybody objects, please speak up now.

This change is in place and the web site changes are live on 
incubator.apache.org/derby . From my poking, it seems stable. Please 
report any problems.

  -jean