You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2006/07/19 23:08:54 UTC
Review mock apache build of Cayenne 2.0
I just posted a mock release build of Cayenne 2.0, looking the way it
will when released from Apache:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/cayenne-2.0-incubating-
SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
I'd like to ask our mentors (or anybody else for that matter, who
understands the Apache release legal requirements) to download it and
comment on whether anything is done wrong.
Again, this is NOT a release vote. We still need to get a few more
CLA's and address the LGPL thingy in the Windows build. This is just
to ensure that our build scripts are compliant before we branch 2.0
in Subversion and open HEAD for 3.0 commits.
Thanks
Andrus
Re: Review mock apache build of Cayenne 2.0
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Just put an updated archive on the site. DISCLAIMER text file is in the
> root directory.
I like that file name -- nobody can mistake it!
-jean
> Andrus
>
> On Jul 19, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> It needs a top-level README with the incubator disclaimer in it -- see
>>> http://tinyurl.com/p5lf3
>>>
>>> It's possible the disclaimer is somewhere in
>>> cayenne-2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/doc/index.html , but I'm not
>>> spotting it
>>> with just a quick check (I clicked on each in the index.html).
>>>
>>> I didn't spot any other issues, but didn't look real closely.
>>
>>
>> Good catch - the README was missing. I will add it shortly.
>>
>> Andrus
>
>
Re: Review mock apache build of Cayenne 2.0
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Just put an updated archive on the site. DISCLAIMER text file is in
the root directory.
Andrus
On Jul 19, 2006, at 7:51 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Jul 19, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>
>> It needs a top-level README with the incubator disclaimer in it --
>> see
>> http://tinyurl.com/p5lf3
>>
>> It's possible the disclaimer is somewhere in
>> cayenne-2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/doc/index.html , but I'm not
>> spotting it
>> with just a quick check (I clicked on each in the index.html).
>>
>> I didn't spot any other issues, but didn't look real closely.
>
> Good catch - the README was missing. I will add it shortly.
>
> Andrus
Re: Review mock apache build of Cayenne 2.0
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Jul 19, 2006, at 7:47 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> It needs a top-level README with the incubator disclaimer in it -- see
> http://tinyurl.com/p5lf3
>
> It's possible the disclaimer is somewhere in
> cayenne-2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/doc/index.html , but I'm not
> spotting it
> with just a quick check (I clicked on each in the index.html).
>
> I didn't spot any other issues, but didn't look real closely.
Good catch - the README was missing. I will add it shortly.
Andrus
Re: Review mock apache build of Cayenne 2.0
Posted by "Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@bristowhill.com>.
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I just posted a mock release build of Cayenne 2.0, looking the way it
> will when released from Apache:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/cayenne-2.0-incubating- SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
>
> I'd like to ask our mentors (or anybody else for that matter, who
> understands the Apache release legal requirements) to download it and
> comment on whether anything is done wrong.
It needs a top-level README with the incubator disclaimer in it -- see
http://tinyurl.com/p5lf3
It's possible the disclaimer is somewhere in
cayenne-2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/doc/index.html , but I'm not spotting it
with just a quick check (I clicked on each in the index.html).
I didn't spot any other issues, but didn't look real closely.
-jean
> Again, this is NOT a release vote. We still need to get a few more
> CLA's and address the LGPL thingy in the Windows build. This is just to
> ensure that our build scripts are compliant before we branch 2.0 in
> Subversion and open HEAD for 3.0 commits.
>
> Thanks
> Andrus