You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@hudi.apache.org by "Nicholas Jiang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/09/22 12:48:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HUDI-1257) Insert only write operations
should preserve duplicate records
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17200050#comment-17200050 ]
Nicholas Jiang edited comment on HUDI-1257 at 9/22/20, 12:47 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[~vbalaji], Does this issue is duplicated with [Insert new records regardless of small file when using insert operation|https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HUDI/issues/HUDI-1234]?
was (Author: nicholasjiang):
[~vbalaji]Do this issue is duplicated with [Insert new records regardless of small file when using insert operation|https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HUDI/issues/HUDI-1234]?
> Insert only write operations should preserve duplicate records
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-1257
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1257
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Writer Core
> Reporter: Balaji Varadarajan
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 0.6.1
>
>
> [https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/2051]
>
> ```
> I think the point [@jiegzhan|https://github.com/jiegzhan] pointed out is reasonable, for insert operation, we should not update the existing records. Right now the behavior/result is different when setting different small file limit, when it is set to 0, the new inserts will not update the old records and write into a new file, but when it is set to other value such as 128M, the new inserts may update the old records lies in small file picked up the UpsertPartitioner.
> ```
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)