You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Benjamin Mahler <bm...@apache.org> on 2017/08/15 07:00:36 UTC

Review Request 61642: Introduced a Framework::idle function in the agent.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

This ensures the call-sites consistently check idleness of the
framework, it also aids readability in that it clarifies that
we remove idle frameworks.


Diffs
-----

  src/slave/slave.hpp 1fe93dab1b2bef24721cc1bcffebe1b259e96d79 
  src/slave/slave.cpp 7381530515f86faf4c3e8f82bcd9483f6cf0498b 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/1/


Testing
-------

make check


Thanks,

Benjamin Mahler


Re: Review Request 61642: Introduced a Framework::idle function in the agent.

Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/#review183547
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/slave/slave.hpp
Lines 857 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/#comment259553>

    Can you add a TODO here to ensure a framework is not considered idle until terminal updates for pending tasks are not acked?


- Vinod Kone


On Aug. 22, 2017, 7:46 p.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2017, 7:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This ensures the call-sites consistently check idleness of the
> framework, it also aids readability in that it clarifies that
> we remove idle frameworks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 0e07a1af733003bb897cbebb7c1f64437063353d 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 50d2a10cd68f6611efd4e691e5325e6e0c06f33a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>


Re: Review Request 61642: Introduced a Framework::idle function in the agent.

Posted by Benjamin Mahler <bm...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Aug. 22, 2017, 7:46 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.


Changes
-------

Rebased and clarified that idle includes no unacknowledged status updates.


Repository: mesos


Description
-------

This ensures the call-sites consistently check idleness of the
framework, it also aids readability in that it clarifies that
we remove idle frameworks.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/slave/slave.hpp 0e07a1af733003bb897cbebb7c1f64437063353d 
  src/slave/slave.cpp 50d2a10cd68f6611efd4e691e5325e6e0c06f33a 


Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/2/

Changes: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/1-2/


Testing
-------

make check


Thanks,

Benjamin Mahler


Re: Review Request 61642: Introduced a Framework::idle function in the agent.

Posted by Benjamin Mahler <bm...@apache.org>.

> On Aug. 22, 2017, 5:35 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.hpp
> > Lines 854 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/1/?file=1797220#file1797220line854>
> >
> >     I think "active" here might be misleading; we don't remove the framework if tasks/executors have been terminated but acks have not been received.
> >     
> >     How about:
> >     
> >     // Returns whether the framework all the frameworks's tasks and executors have completed,
> >     // i.e., terminated and in case of tasks, also received acknowledgements for all pending updates.
> >     
> >     Still debating whether "idle" is a better word than "empty"

Updated the description:

```
  // Returns whether the framework is idle, where idle is
  // defined as having no activity:
  //   (1) The framework has no non-terminal tasks and executors.
  //   (2) All status updates have been acknowledged.
  bool idle() const;
```


- Benjamin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/#review183492
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 15, 2017, 7 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2017, 7 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This ensures the call-sites consistently check idleness of the
> framework, it also aids readability in that it clarifies that
> we remove idle frameworks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 0e07a1af733003bb897cbebb7c1f64437063353d 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 50d2a10cd68f6611efd4e691e5325e6e0c06f33a 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/2/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>


Re: Review Request 61642: Introduced a Framework::idle function in the agent.

Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/#review183492
-----------------------------------------------------------


Fix it, then Ship it!





src/slave/slave.hpp
Lines 854 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/#comment259509>

    I think "active" here might be misleading; we don't remove the framework if tasks/executors have been terminated but acks have not been received.
    
    How about:
    
    // Returns whether the framework all the frameworks's tasks and executors have completed,
    // i.e., terminated and in case of tasks, also received acknowledgements for all pending updates.
    
    Still debating whether "idle" is a better word than "empty"


- Vinod Kone


On Aug. 15, 2017, 7 a.m., Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2017, 7 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Anand Mazumdar and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This ensures the call-sites consistently check idleness of the
> framework, it also aids readability in that it clarifies that
> we remove idle frameworks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 1fe93dab1b2bef24721cc1bcffebe1b259e96d79 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 7381530515f86faf4c3e8f82bcd9483f6cf0498b 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/61642/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Mahler
> 
>