You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/06 03:10:42 UTC
[VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution
files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one
generated by release.sh is not used?).
The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris platform.
+/-1
[ ] Release apr-1.3.11
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As for 1.3.11, I'm happy to start over after apr_hints.m4 is fixed or
>> proceed with what we have now, as desired.
>
> I committed the 1-character change that got my system working, but I
> couldn't get it to misbehave anywhere else.
>
> Probably best to start over since it seems you still have binding
> votes to wait for
will-do
I did go ahead and test on Solaris 10 and Leopard and all is well as
far as "make check" and a couple of private pollset tests that
exercise more of port.c.
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As for 1.3.11, I'm happy to start over after apr_hints.m4 is fixed or
> proceed with what we have now, as desired.
I committed the 1-character change that got my system working, but I
couldn't get it to misbehave anywhere else.
Probably best to start over since it seems you still have binding
votes to wait for
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
>>> See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution
>>> files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one
>>> generated by release.sh is not used?).
>>>
>>> The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris
>>> platform.
>>>
>
> I think changes to the config.guess and config.sub in the tarball are
> breaking on one of my systems.
>
> I am not geting -D_GNU_SOURCE in SLES 10.2/PPC, which breaks testcond
> use of nested mutexes
>
> I think the culprit is the detected target (relative to 1.3.9)
>
> -target='powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu'
> +target='powerpc64-suse-linux'
>
> The lack of -gnu is breaking our apr_hints.m4, which requires *-linux-*.
>
> I tried grabbing the latest upstream config.sub/guess and re-running
> buildconf, but it didn't change the target or the symptom
On the bright side we pick up support for AIX 6.
apr_hints.m4 in 1.3.x through trunk (and perhaps 0.9.x as well) needs
to handle the new string.
As for 1.3.11, I'm happy to start over after apr_hints.m4 is fixed or
proceed with what we have now, as desired.
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution
>> files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one
>> generated by release.sh is not used?).
>>
>> The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris
>> platform.
>>
I think changes to the config.guess and config.sub in the tarball are
breaking on one of my systems.
I am not geting -D_GNU_SOURCE in SLES 10.2/PPC, which breaks testcond
use of nested mutexes
I think the culprit is the detected target (relative to 1.3.9)
-target='powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu'
+target='powerpc64-suse-linux'
The lack of -gnu is breaking our apr_hints.m4, which requires *-linux-*.
I tried grabbing the latest upstream config.sub/guess and re-running
buildconf, but it didn't change the target or the symptom
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by "Gregg L. Smith" <li...@glewis.com>.
> [+1] Release apr-1.3.11
Tossing my peanut in the +1 bucket.
testlib: testall.exe - 0 error(s), 1 warning(s)
testdll: testall.exe - 0 error(s), 1 warning(s)
WinXP VS6 & 9 and builds well in and out of httpd
Gregg
Jeff Trawick wrote:
> See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution
> files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one
> generated by release.sh is not used?).
>
> The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris platform.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release apr-1.3.11
>
Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.11
Posted by Mario Brandt <jb...@gmail.com>.
[x] Release apr-1.3.11
non-binding +1
builds fine for me on Win7 with VS9 Express
Mario