[jira] [Commented] (GORA-228) java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when using MemStore for concurrent tests

["Renato Javier Marroquín Mogrovejo (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14101313#comment-14101313 ] 

Renato Javier Marroquín Mogrovejo commented on GORA-228:
--------------------------------------------------------

Hi [~hsaputra],

I think we should continue having/supporting MemStore as it is because this lets us test Gora without external dependencies (which was a requirement when integrating with Apache Giraph). Now supporting a "real in-memory shared" stored is a different story.
I will try to check this over the weekend guys :)

> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when using MemStore for concurrent tests
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GORA-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228
>             Project: Apache Gora
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: gora-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Assignee: Yasin Kılınç
>             Fix For: 0.6
>
>         Attachments: GORA-228.patch
>
>
> Finally, a multithreaded test in [3] fails with the following
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
> 	at java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapIterator.nextEntry(TreeMap.java:1594)
> 	at java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapKeyIterator.next(TreeMap.java:1655)
> 	at org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStore$MemResult.nextInner(MemStore.java:81)
> 	at org.apache.gora.query.impl.ResultBase.next(ResultBase.java:112)
> 	at org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.readWrite(TestGoraStorage.java:74)
> 	at org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.access$100(TestGoraStorage.java:41)
> 	at org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:107)
> 	at org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:102)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
> 	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
> 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> {code}
> I believe that the final failure is due to to the use of TreeMap [5] as a private object in MemStore. TreeMap implementations are not synchronized. If multiple threads access a map concurrently, and at least one of the threads modifies the map structurally, it must be synchronized externally. (A structural modification is any operation that adds or deletes one or more mappings; merely changing the value associated with an existing key is not a structural modification.) This is typically accomplished by synchronizing on some object that naturally encapsulates the map. If no such object exists, the map should be "wrapped" using the Collections.synchronizedSortedMap method. This is best done at creation time, to prevent accidental unsynchronized access to the map e.g.
>    SortedMap m = Collections.synchronizedSortedMap(new TreeMap(...));
> N.B. The NOTE on TreeMap's come right from the Oracle JavaDoc.
> [3] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/storage/TestGoraStorage.java?view=markup
> [4] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/util/AbstractNutchTest.java?view=markup
> [5] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/TreeMap.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)