You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de> on 2001/12/18 11:04:25 UTC
Status of xmldb Protocol?
Hi Team,
what's the status of the xmldb protocol currently checked into the HEAD?
If it is working, what about adding the protocol to the cocoon.xconf?
If it needs some more work, we should move it to the scratchpad directory.
Carsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Status of xmldb Protocol?
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
> Carsten,
>
> We had a VOTE sometime ago about this:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100824080301449&w=4:
>
> >> > I'd like to have your opinion about adding XML:DB stuff ad a
> default
> >> > component to the HEAD version of Cocoon. Given that there's been a
> lot
> >> > of talk about this API lately, and given also that Xindice is going
> to
> >> > come up shortly as an Apache project, I start to think that having
> the
> >> > XML:DB components compiled in by default will add visibility to
> this
> >> > newcomer in the Apache XML arena and let people play with it,
> possibly
> >> > contributing code.
> <snip/>
>
> The results are: 6 people for adding xmldb.jar, and 5 people for
> removing XML:DB generators, with John Morrison saying that "I *believe*
> people are using this...".
>
Ah, yes, now I remember!
> So I guess we should proceed with adding XML:DB protocol and deprecate
> XML:DB generators. Does it make any sense?
>
+1
Carsten
> Regards,
> Vadim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:gianugo@rabellino.it]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:26 PM
> > To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Status of xmldb Protocol?
> >
> > Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Team,
> > >
> > > what's the status of the xmldb protocol currently checked into the
> HEAD?
> >
> >
> > AFAIK it's working, with some guys already using it but I'd like to
> have
> > some 3rd party review :) It's missing the XPath query part, but it's
> > usable to me.
> >
> > > If it is working, what about adding the protocol to the
> cocoon.xconf?
> >
> >
> > +1 for me. Though I might not be able to support it for the next few
> > weeks (too busy with my new job).
> >
> > Ciao,
> >
> > --
> > Gianugo
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
RE: Status of xmldb Protocol?
Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.
Carsten,
We had a VOTE sometime ago about this:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=100824080301449&w=4:
>> > I'd like to have your opinion about adding XML:DB stuff ad a
default
>> > component to the HEAD version of Cocoon. Given that there's been a
lot
>> > of talk about this API lately, and given also that Xindice is going
to
>> > come up shortly as an Apache project, I start to think that having
the
>> > XML:DB components compiled in by default will add visibility to
this
>> > newcomer in the Apache XML arena and let people play with it,
possibly
>> > contributing code.
<snip/>
The results are: 6 people for adding xmldb.jar, and 5 people for
removing XML:DB generators, with John Morrison saying that "I *believe*
people are using this...".
So I guess we should proceed with adding XML:DB protocol and deprecate
XML:DB generators. Does it make any sense?
Regards,
Vadim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gianugo Rabellino [mailto:gianugo@rabellino.it]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:26 PM
> To: cocoon-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Status of xmldb Protocol?
>
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > what's the status of the xmldb protocol currently checked into the
HEAD?
>
>
> AFAIK it's working, with some guys already using it but I'd like to
have
> some 3rd party review :) It's missing the XPath query part, but it's
> usable to me.
>
> > If it is working, what about adding the protocol to the
cocoon.xconf?
>
>
> +1 for me. Though I might not be able to support it for the next few
> weeks (too busy with my new job).
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> Gianugo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: Status of xmldb Protocol?
Posted by Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@rabellino.it>.
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> what's the status of the xmldb protocol currently checked into the HEAD?
AFAIK it's working, with some guys already using it but I'd like to have
some 3rd party review :) It's missing the XPath query part, but it's
usable to me.
> If it is working, what about adding the protocol to the cocoon.xconf?
+1 for me. Though I might not be able to support it for the next few
weeks (too busy with my new job).
Ciao,
--
Gianugo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cocoon-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: cocoon-dev-help@xml.apache.org