You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net> on 2016/05/07 23:40:22 UTC
Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Hi all,
I just fixed the HTTP/HTTPS issue Philipp discovered after publishing
the homepage. To solve this problem I had to add all original remote
hostet resources to our repository. The resources copied from Twitter
Bootstrap are under the ASF 2.0 license. Only jQuery is licensed unter
the MIT license.
I think this could be a possible issue for the source distribution of
Tamaya.
WDYT?
Oliver
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Sch�nhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
Am 10.05.16 um 12:33 schrieb John D. Ament:
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:20 AM Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>
> wrote:
>
>> So, it seems to be ok to mention it in the license file. I will add this.
>>
>>
> While OK, its not the preferred approach. Any reason we must include the
> website in the source distribution?
>
>
No. I think we could exclude it from the source distribution.
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Sch�nhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:20 AM Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>
wrote:
> So, it seems to be ok to mention it in the license file. I will add this.
>
>
While OK, its not the preferred approach. Any reason we must include the
website in the source distribution?
> Am 09.05.16 um 14:00 schrieb Werner Keil:
> > Probably keep it in a separate Maven module with the appropriate NOTICE
> > file?
> > Then the actual library has less to worry about.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and
> LICENSE.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be
> >> excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about.
> >>
> >>
> >> deliverables,
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup
> >> the
> >> Bootstrap
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
So, it seems to be ok to mention it in the license file. I will add this.
Am 09.05.16 um 14:00 schrieb Werner Keil:
> Probably keep it in a separate Maven module with the appropriate NOTICE
> file?
> Then the actual library has less to worry about.
>
>
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and LICENSE.
>>
>>
>>
>> So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be
>> excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about.
>>
>>
>> deliverables,
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup
>> the
>> Bootstrap
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Sch�nhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Probably keep it in a separate Maven module with the appropriate NOTICE
file?
Then the actual library has less to worry about.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:25 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Why, is MIT incompliant or at least "not liked" by Apache?;-O
> >
>
> No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
>
>
> > Plus isn't that only part of the "site" or where would jQuery be used by
> > Tamaya as such during runtime?
> >
>
> So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be
> excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about.
>
>
> >
> > We have an even more dubious case of a "license assumption" since the W3C
> > WG for DDR never properly put a license statement into their
> deliverables,
> > so we needed a special NOTICE file for certain parts of DeviceMap:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup
> > Having a similar paragraph in a NOTICE file or files of Tamaya should do
> > IMHO.
> >
> > Especially Bruno from SouJava (with Otavio representing them at Tamaya)
> > should be able to say something about that, too.
> >
> > CU tomorrow,
> >
> > Werner
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
> > o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I just fixed the HTTP/HTTPS issue Philipp discovered after publishing
> the
> > > homepage. To solve this problem I had to add all original remote hostet
> > > resources to our repository. The resources copied from Twitter
> Bootstrap
> > > are under the ASF 2.0 license. Only jQuery is licensed unter the MIT
> > > license.
> > >
> > > I think this could be a possible issue for the source distribution of
> > > Tamaya.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Oliver
> > >
> > > --
> > > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > > P +49 30 44793251
> > > M +49 178 7903538
> > > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > > S oliver.b.fischer
> > > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > > X http://xing.to/obf
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why, is MIT incompliant or at least "not liked" by Apache?;-O
>
No, its perfectly fine to use as long as called out in NOTICE and LICENSE.
> Plus isn't that only part of the "site" or where would jQuery be used by
> Tamaya as such during runtime?
>
So I guess this may lie better with my perspective. If the site can be
excluded from the source release, we have nothing to worry about.
>
> We have an even more dubious case of a "license assumption" since the W3C
> WG for DDR never properly put a license statement into their deliverables,
> so we needed a special NOTICE file for certain parts of DeviceMap:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup
> Having a similar paragraph in a NOTICE file or files of Tamaya should do
> IMHO.
>
> Especially Bruno from SouJava (with Otavio representing them at Tamaya)
> should be able to say something about that, too.
>
> CU tomorrow,
>
> Werner
>
>
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <
> o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just fixed the HTTP/HTTPS issue Philipp discovered after publishing the
> > homepage. To solve this problem I had to add all original remote hostet
> > resources to our repository. The resources copied from Twitter Bootstrap
> > are under the ASF 2.0 license. Only jQuery is licensed unter the MIT
> > license.
> >
> > I think this could be a possible issue for the source distribution of
> > Tamaya.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> > --
> > N Oliver B. Fischer
> > A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> > P +49 30 44793251
> > M +49 178 7903538
> > E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> > S oliver.b.fischer
> > J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> > X http://xing.to/obf
> >
> >
>
Re: Homepage, local resources and the MIT license
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Why, is MIT incompliant or at least "not liked" by Apache?;-O
Plus isn't that only part of the "site" or where would jQuery be used by
Tamaya as such during runtime?
We have an even more dubious case of a "license assumption" since the W3C
WG for DDR never properly put a license statement into their deliverables,
so we needed a special NOTICE file for certain parts of DeviceMap:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/devicemap/trunk/clients/w3c-ddr/simpleddr/NOTICE?view=markup
Having a similar paragraph in a NOTICE file or files of Tamaya should do
IMHO.
Especially Bruno from SouJava (with Otavio representing them at Tamaya)
should be able to say something about that, too.
CU tomorrow,
Werner
On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Oliver B. Fischer <o....@swe-blog.net>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just fixed the HTTP/HTTPS issue Philipp discovered after publishing the
> homepage. To solve this problem I had to add all original remote hostet
> resources to our repository. The resources copied from Twitter Bootstrap
> are under the ASF 2.0 license. Only jQuery is licensed unter the MIT
> license.
>
> I think this could be a possible issue for the source distribution of
> Tamaya.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Oliver
>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>