You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> on 2007/01/08 01:19:47 UTC
Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and Timepicker.
The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
-Ted.
On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: mrdon
> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
> New Revision: 493867
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
> Log:
> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of DatePicker and
> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
> WW-1596
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mb...@wfscorp.com>.
We need to remove :
dojo.require("struts.widget.DatePicker");
dojo.require("struts.widget.TimePicker");
from dojoRequire.js
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
> I'm not following - the simple theme's implementation of the head tag
> loads Dojo. This will definitely change when we move Dojo out of
> core, as IMO, the simple theme shouldn't require any Javascript unless
> you use attributes that use it.
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
>> I expect that we would address this in WW-1607, but if all the head
>> tag does is load dojo, then should it be implemented by the simple
>> theme?
>>
>> * http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/simple-head-template.html
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On 1/8/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>> They needed the <s:head> tag, and the date picker needed to have its
>>> default date format parsing pattern changed to the RFC 3399 one.
>>>
>>> Don
>>>
>>> Ted Husted wrote:
>>> > I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
>>> >
>>> > -Ted.
>>> >
>>> > On 1/7/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>> >> Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the
>>> datepicker
>>> >> and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were
>>> broken, and
>>> >> missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag,
>>> and one
>>> >> that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice.
>>> The
>>> >> remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased
>>> in the
>>> >> ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing
>>> to do
>>> >> with ajax.
>>> >>
>>> >> Don
>>> >>
>>> >> Ted Husted wrote:
>>> >> > Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
>>> >> > Timepicker.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to
>>> have
>>> >> > been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -Ted.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >> >> Author: mrdon
>>> >> >> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
>>> >> >> New Revision: 493867
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
>>> >> >> Log:
>>> >> >> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
>>> >> >> DatePicker and
>>> >> >> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
>>> >> >> WW-1596
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
I'm not following - the simple theme's implementation of the head tag
loads Dojo. This will definitely change when we move Dojo out of core,
as IMO, the simple theme shouldn't require any Javascript unless you use
attributes that use it.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> I expect that we would address this in WW-1607, but if all the head
> tag does is load dojo, then should it be implemented by the simple
> theme?
>
> * http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/simple-head-template.html
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 1/8/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> They needed the <s:head> tag, and the date picker needed to have its
>> default date format parsing pattern changed to the RFC 3399 one.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> Ted Husted wrote:
>> > I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
>> >
>> > -Ted.
>> >
>> > On 1/7/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> >> Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
>> >> and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were
>> broken, and
>> >> missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag,
>> and one
>> >> that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
>> >> remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased
>> in the
>> >> ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing
>> to do
>> >> with ajax.
>> >>
>> >> Don
>> >>
>> >> Ted Husted wrote:
>> >> > Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
>> >> > Timepicker.
>> >> >
>> >> > The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to
>> have
>> >> > been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Ted.
>> >> >
>> >> > On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> >> Author: mrdon
>> >> >> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
>> >> >> New Revision: 493867
>> >> >>
>> >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
>> >> >> Log:
>> >> >> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
>> >> >> DatePicker and
>> >> >> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
>> >> >> WW-1596
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I expect that we would address this in WW-1607, but if all the head
tag does is load dojo, then should it be implemented by the simple
theme?
* http://cwiki.apache.org/WW/simple-head-template.html
-Ted.
On 1/8/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> They needed the <s:head> tag, and the date picker needed to have its
> default date format parsing pattern changed to the RFC 3399 one.
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 1/7/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> >> Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
> >> and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were broken, and
> >> missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag, and one
> >> that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
> >> remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased in the
> >> ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing to do
> >> with ajax.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> Ted Husted wrote:
> >> > Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
> >> > Timepicker.
> >> >
> >> > The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
> >> > been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
> >> >
> >> > -Ted.
> >> >
> >> > On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >> Author: mrdon
> >> >> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
> >> >> New Revision: 493867
> >> >>
> >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
> >> >> Log:
> >> >> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
> >> >> DatePicker and
> >> >> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
> >> >> WW-1596
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
They needed the <s:head> tag, and the date picker needed to have its
default date format parsing pattern changed to the RFC 3399 one.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 1/7/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
>> and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were broken, and
>> missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag, and one
>> that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
>> remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased in the
>> ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing to do
>> with ajax.
>>
>> Don
>>
>> Ted Husted wrote:
>> > Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
>> > Timepicker.
>> >
>> > The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
>> > been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
>> >
>> > -Ted.
>> >
>> > On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> Author: mrdon
>> >> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
>> >> New Revision: 493867
>> >>
>> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
>> >> Log:
>> >> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
>> >> DatePicker and
>> >> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
>> >> WW-1596
>> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org>.
I brought the example pages over, but they do not seem to work now.
-Ted.
On 1/7/07, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
> and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were broken, and
> missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag, and one
> that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
> remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased in the
> ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing to do
> with ajax.
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
> > Timepicker.
> >
> > The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
> > been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Author: mrdon
> >> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
> >> New Revision: 493867
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
> >> Log:
> >> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
> >> DatePicker and
> >> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
> >> WW-1596
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Datepicker and Timepicker examples
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Yes, because I removed the tags they were showcasing - the datepicker
and timepicker. Those two tags didn't have unit tests, were broken, and
missing pieces. I think we only need one date/time picking tag, and one
that most closely mirrors what WebWork 2 had is the best choice. The
remaining tag, datetimepicker, does what we need and is showcased in the
ui tags, a better place than the ajax pages since it has nothing to do
with ajax.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> Did we mean to remove the Showcase pages for the Datepicker and
> Timepicker.
>
> The pages for dropdowndatepicker and dropdowntimepicker seem to have
> been deleted, but I don't see replacements.
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 1/7/07, mrdon@apache.org <mr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: mrdon
>> Date: Sun Jan 7 14:26:23 2007
>> New Revision: 493867
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=493867
>> Log:
>> Renamed DropDownDateTimePicker to DateTimePicker and got rid of
>> DatePicker and
>> TimePicker, better aligning Struts 2 with WebWork 2 offerings.
>> WW-1596
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org