You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@brooklyn.apache.org by "Aled Sage (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/01 14:50:12 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (BROOKLYN-98) Deploying JBoss6Server to AWS fails: jmx port not open

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-98?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Aled Sage reassigned BROOKLYN-98:
---------------------------------

    Assignee: Aled Sage

> Deploying JBoss6Server to AWS fails: jmx port not open
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BROOKLYN-98
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BROOKLYN-98
>             Project: Brooklyn
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT
>            Reporter: Aled Sage
>            Assignee: Aled Sage
>
> A customer reported failure when deploying JBoss6Server to aws-ec2 (timeout waiting for service up to be true).
> The `jmx.service.url` is `service:jmx:jmxmp://ec2-54-145-128-228.compute-1.amazonaws.com:31002` (note this is *not* port 31001).
> The entity also shows the fields:
>     `jmx.direct.port.legacy.NOT_USED` on port `31001`
>     `jmx.direct.port` on port `31002`.
> The aws security group only opened 31001.
> The problem is caused by the two `PortAttributeSensorAndConfigKey` in `UsesJmx` both pointing at `31001+`. When creating the VM, it only opens the first port in that range (i.e. 31001). However, when actually allocating values to the sensors the first gets 31001 and the second gets 31002. It may be a race which sensor gets which value.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)