You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to github@beam.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/08/16 19:17:15 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] reuvenlax commented on issue #21893: [Bug]: BigQuery Storage Write API implementation does not support table partitioning

reuvenlax commented on issue #21893:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21893#issuecomment-1217059301

   It means that your build is probably pulling in a different version of the
   BigQuery library than the one used by Beam.
   
   On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:35 AM Helen Cristina ***@***.***>
   wrote:
   
   > Hi! Coming back to this issue later than expected. Do you mean if I run
   > the pipeline with latest version now (2.40 instead of 2.39) I could get a
   > different result? I'll try and reach out with the results.
   >
   > —
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21893#issuecomment-1216945446>, or
   > unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAYJVLK3KZBSKLEPHOCKBLVZPGNVANCNFSM5Y337EKA>
   > .
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
   > ***@***.***>
   >
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org