Status of CouchDB and Roadmap

[Gustavo Machado <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hi guys,

I was driven to couchdb lately and so far it looks like pure awesome. I
remember back in the days when we were choosing a document database, that
we chose MongoDB against CouchDB because of the project stability and
roadmap. At the time, several people said that CouchDB was not being very
active. I went to the repo and looks like pretty active to me, so I wonder
why people would say that at the time.

Does anybody find any of this reasonable? (Maybe they meant in comparison
to Mongo?)

Anyways, I have already decided to use couch in my next pet project :)

Thanks,
Gustavo

Re: Status of CouchDB and Roadmap

[Benjamin Eberlei <ko...@beberlei.de>]

I suppose there is a difference between the percieved activeness through
company and non-company driven marketing for MongoDB and CouchDB.

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:48 PM, CGS <cg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gustavo,
>
> I suppose it is referred to the bit of delay in releasing version 1.2.0,
> but otherwise you get here quite an active community.
>
> Have fun and relax! ;)
>
> CGS
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Gustavo Machado <machadogj@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was driven to couchdb lately and so far it looks like pure awesome. I
> > remember back in the days when we were choosing a document database, that
> > we chose MongoDB against CouchDB because of the project stability and
> > roadmap. At the time, several people said that CouchDB was not being very
> > active. I went to the repo and looks like pretty active to me, so I
> wonder
> > why people would say that at the time.
> >
> > Does anybody find any of this reasonable? (Maybe they meant in comparison
> > to Mongo?)
> >
> > Anyways, I have already decided to use couch in my next pet project :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gustavo
> >
>

Re: Status of CouchDB and Roadmap

[CGS <cg...@gmail.com>]

Hi Gustavo,

I suppose it is referred to the bit of delay in releasing version 1.2.0,
but otherwise you get here quite an active community.

Have fun and relax! ;)

CGS



On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Gustavo Machado <ma...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> I was driven to couchdb lately and so far it looks like pure awesome. I
> remember back in the days when we were choosing a document database, that
> we chose MongoDB against CouchDB because of the project stability and
> roadmap. At the time, several people said that CouchDB was not being very
> active. I went to the repo and looks like pretty active to me, so I wonder
> why people would say that at the time.
>
> Does anybody find any of this reasonable? (Maybe they meant in comparison
> to Mongo?)
>
> Anyways, I have already decided to use couch in my next pet project :)
>
> Thanks,
> Gustavo
>