You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by drew <dr...@baseanswers.com> on 2011/11/29 18:21:10 UTC

[OT[ Re: Neutral / shared security list ...

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 08:45 -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello guys;
> 
> --- On Tue, 11/29/11, Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Michael,
> > 
> > While some might have hoped for another proposal and
> > discussion prior to action, thank you for going ahead where
> > there was clearly no consensus for specific action on the
> > AOO side.
> > 
> 
> As I see it, this list is not official. The AOO PPMC has no
> influence whatever over it, but that is precisely the type
> of "neutrality" the involved actors wanted.
> 
> I think it's OK, building bridges is always good.
> 
> Just a thought here concerning as to how far this involves
> the Apache podling.
> 
> Of course, Apache PPMC members can join any lists they like
> without asking permission to the PPMC, but any decision
> concerning forwarding email from an OOo domain has to go
> through the PPMC. I would think the principles in the recent
> ASF policy statement  regarding forwarding email from
> openoffice.org domains would apply to private lists too. 
> 
> Just something to think about; I am not a PPMC member (I
> am considering it, though) 

Hi,

I've been very quite - ok, MIA - but this message deserves a reply.

Pedro - you really would add value and I would urge you to join the
PPMC.

Sincerely,

Drew Jensen


Re: [OT[ Re: Neutral / shared security list ...

Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:21 PM, drew <dr...@baseanswers.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 08:45 -0800, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>> Hello guys;
>>
>> --- On Tue, 11/29/11, Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Michael,
>> >
>> > While some might have hoped for another proposal and
>> > discussion prior to action, thank you for going ahead where
>> > there was clearly no consensus for specific action on the
>> > AOO side.
>> >
>>
>> As I see it, this list is not official. The AOO PPMC has no
>> influence whatever over it, but that is precisely the type
>> of "neutrality" the involved actors wanted.
>>
>> I think it's OK, building bridges is always good.
>>
>> Just a thought here concerning as to how far this involves
>> the Apache podling.
>>
>> Of course, Apache PPMC members can join any lists they like
>> without asking permission to the PPMC, but any decision
>> concerning forwarding email from an OOo domain has to go
>> through the PPMC. I would think the principles in the recent
>> ASF policy statement  regarding forwarding email from
>> openoffice.org domains would apply to private lists too.
>>
>> Just something to think about; I am not a PPMC member (I
>> am considering it, though)
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been very quite - ok, MIA - but this message deserves a reply.
>
> Pedro - you really would add value and I would urge you to join the
> PPMC.
>

+1

> Sincerely,
>
> Drew Jensen
>