You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by "ravi.n" <ra...@ornext.com> on 2012/11/12 18:49:43 UTC
SOLR - Search Issue
Hello Guys,
We had a requirement to search existing lucene indexes and configure to
indexing new data.
1. Installed apache-solr-3.6.1 and setup multicore for the existing indexes.
2. Solr is running on windows platform with tomcat 7 64 bit
3. Coll1 and Coll2 has old lucene index files and new indexing data will be
stored in coll3
<solr persistent="false">
<cores adminPath="/admin/cores" sharedLib="lib" defaultCoreName="coll3">
<core name="coll1" instanceDir="1" />
<core name="coll2" instanceDir="2" />
<core name="coll3" instanceDir="3" />
</cores>
</solr>
4.Now we are indexing data from CSV file thru curl
curl http://localhost:8080/solr/update/csv -F "stream.file=D:\eighth.csv" -F
"commit=true" -F "optimize=true" -F "encapsulate=""
While searching all the cores with shards, the new core is not considered.
- We have maintained same conf and schema across all cores
http://94.101.147.150:8080/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&shards=localhost:8080/solr/coll1,localhost:8080/solr/coll2,localhost:8080/solr/coll3
We observe that there is difference in index format, got to know thru luke
browser.
Old Lucene Indexes: Index format -9 (Lucene 2.9)
New Lucene Indexes: Index format -11(Lucene 3.1)
1. How can we make these 3 cores work together?
2. Is there any option to migrate the old Index format 2.9 to newer?
This has been a show stopper for us, any help would be really appreciated.
Regards,
Ravi
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SOLR - Search Issue
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>.
You can issue an optimize request to Solr, just peek at the Wiki.
IndexUpgrader is a command-line tool.
No coding needed (tm)
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:59 PM, ravi.n <ra...@ornext.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
> Can be this done by Solr or should we write Java class?
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816p4019939.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: SOLR - Search Issue
Posted by "ravi.n" <ra...@ornext.com>.
Thanks.
Can be this done by Solr or should we write Java class?
Regards,
Ravi
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816p4019939.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: SOLR - Search Issue
Posted by Otis Gospodnetic <ot...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Have you tried optimizing your indices? That should upgrade their format
to whatever Solr/Lucene version you are using.
You could also try IndexUpgrader -
http://search-lucene.com/jd/lucene/core/org/apache/lucene/index/IndexUpgrader.html
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:49 PM, ravi.n <ra...@ornext.com> wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
> We had a requirement to search existing lucene indexes and configure to
> indexing new data.
>
> 1. Installed apache-solr-3.6.1 and setup multicore for the existing
> indexes.
> 2. Solr is running on windows platform with tomcat 7 64 bit
> 3. Coll1 and Coll2 has old lucene index files and new indexing data will be
> stored in coll3
> <solr persistent="false">
> <cores adminPath="/admin/cores" sharedLib="lib" defaultCoreName="coll3">
> <core name="coll1" instanceDir="1" />
> <core name="coll2" instanceDir="2" />
> <core name="coll3" instanceDir="3" />
> </cores>
> </solr>
>
> 4.Now we are indexing data from CSV file thru curl
> curl http://localhost:8080/solr/update/csv -F "stream.file=D:\eighth.csv"
> -F
> "commit=true" -F "optimize=true" -F "encapsulate=""
>
> While searching all the cores with shards, the new core is not considered.
> - We have maintained same conf and schema across all cores
>
>
> http://94.101.147.150:8080/solr/select/?q=*%3A*&version=2.2&start=0&rows=10&indent=on&shards=localhost:8080/solr/coll1,localhost:8080/solr/coll2,localhost:8080/solr/coll3
>
> We observe that there is difference in index format, got to know thru luke
> browser.
>
> Old Lucene Indexes: Index format -9 (Lucene 2.9)
> New Lucene Indexes: Index format -11(Lucene 3.1)
>
> 1. How can we make these 3 cores work together?
> 2. Is there any option to migrate the old Index format 2.9 to newer?
>
> This has been a show stopper for us, any help would be really appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-Search-Issue-tp4019816.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>