Re: Create a security committee?

["Kresten Krab Thorup (Trifork)" <kr...@trifork.com>]

I'd be happy to be part of this also.

Kresten Krab Thorup
krab@trifork.com


On Nov 19, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:

> All,
>
> I'd really like to have a group of interested and available people to
> review security-related changes to Geronimo.  And by this I mean,
> features dealing with SSL, security realms, storing files with
> passwords, showing passwords in the console, establishing procedures
> for "locking down the server", reviewing vulnerability reports, etc.
> I don't really mean nitty gritty details of JACC or conducting a
> comprehensive security audit of the entire codebase.
>
> What would people think of that, and are there any volunteers?
>
> I should also note that I expect some vulnerabilities to be reported
> to the PMC rather than to the public list, but I think a lot can be
> done outside the PMC as well (or maybe I should exclude reviewing
> vulnerability reports from what I'm talking about, I don't know if
> there's a policy there).
>
> Thanks,
>     Aaron

Re: Create a security committee?

[Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com>]

I would also like to help in this endeavor...

-Donald

Kresten Krab Thorup (Trifork) wrote:
> I'd be happy to be part of this also.
> 
> Kresten Krab Thorup
> krab@trifork.com
> 
> 
> On Nov 19, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> 
>> All,
>>
>> I'd really like to have a group of interested and available people to
>> review security-related changes to Geronimo.  And by this I mean,
>> features dealing with SSL, security realms, storing files with
>> passwords, showing passwords in the console, establishing procedures
>> for "locking down the server", reviewing vulnerability reports, etc.
>> I don't really mean nitty gritty details of JACC or conducting a
>> comprehensive security audit of the entire codebase.
>>
>> What would people think of that, and are there any volunteers?
>>
>> I should also note that I expect some vulnerabilities to be reported
>> to the PMC rather than to the public list, but I think a lot can be
>> done outside the PMC as well (or maybe I should exclude reviewing
>> vulnerability reports from what I'm talking about, I don't know if
>> there's a policy there).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>     Aaron
> 
>