You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> on 2011/05/31 00:25:27 UTC
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
Please follow our test procedure:
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
Happy voting,
B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 31 May 2011 10:25, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
>
+1
- md5 ok
- sha1 ok
Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B01
- make check ok
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)
Mac OS X 10.6.7 + erlang R14B03
- make check ok
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)
Windows 7 Enterprise + erlang R14B01
- make check n/a as usual (note to self to fix this)
- futon ok (via ff 4.0.1 on Mac OS X 10.6.7)
woo!!!
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by till <ti...@php.net>.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
>
Ubuntu (10.04):
All tests successful.
Files=41, Tests=735, 73 wallclock secs ( 0.44 usr 0.11 sys + 18.82
cusr 2.52 csys = 21.89 CPU)
Result: PASS
FreeBSD:
All tests successful.
Files=41, Tests=735, 85 wallclock secs (20.09 cusr + 3.78 csys = 23.87 CPU)
+1
@Robert: Thanks very, very much for pulling through on this release!
This is really, really appreciated!
Till
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
>
signs ok, make check ok, js tests ok
tested on ubuntu 11.04, fbsd 8.2 (32 & 64), macosx 10.7
tested with erlang r13B04 & erlang r14b03.
+1
- benoît
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
I'm +1 on releasing these artifacts, but I would like to note that, contrary to the INSTALL.Unix instructions, CouchDB 1.1 will not work on Erlang/OTP R12B05. We should update the docs in a future patch release. Cheers,
Adam
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Filipe David Manana <fd...@apache.org>.
Verified, +1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Robert Dionne
<di...@dionne-associates.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> OS X 10.6
> Erlang 14B01
> All tests pass
>
>
>
> On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>>
>> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>>
>> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
>> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>>
>> Please follow our test procedure:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>>
>> Happy voting,
>>
>> B.
>
>
--
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org
"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
+1
OS X 10.6
Erlang 14B01
All tests pass
On May 30, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:51, Sam Bisbee wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>>>
>>> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>>>
>>> - SHA passes
>>> - `make check` passes all tests
>>> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
>>> Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
>>> hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs).
>>> - Root URL signature is correct
>>>
>>> Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
>>> jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
>>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need
>>> to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.
>>
>> The required mentions are in the commit you reference:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>
> I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that
> is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the
> release.
I agree it'd be nice to have this in CHANGES, but AFAIK this is not required. I would not consider this a showstopper though, so thanks for changing your vote :)
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Sam Bisbee <sa...@sbisbee.com>.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
>
>> Howdy,
>>
>> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>>
>> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>>
>> - SHA passes
>> - `make check` passes all tests
>> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
>> Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
>> hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs).
>> - Root URL signature is correct
>>
>> Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
>> jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
>> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need
>> to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.
>
> The required mentions are in the commit you reference:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
>
> Cheers
> Jan
I am surprised that it does not need to be in CHANGES, but since that
is the case and everything else looks so awesome, I am +1 now on the
release.
Cheers,
--
Sam Bisbee
www.sbisbee.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 31 May 2011, at 17:30, Sam Bisbee wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
>
> Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
>
> - SHA passes
> - `make check` passes all tests
> - All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
> Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
> hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs).
> - Root URL signature is correct
>
> Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
> jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need
> to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.
The required mentions are in the commit you reference:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/NOTICE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE?r1=1095523&r2=1095522&pathrev=1095523
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> -1
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Sam Bisbee
> www.sbisbee.com
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>>
>> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>>
>> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
>> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>>
>> Please follow our test procedure:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>>
>> Happy voting,
>>
>> B.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Sam Bisbee <sa...@sbisbee.com>.
Howdy,
The release looks great - awesome job * on all the work!
Ubuntu 10.10 with erlang 1:13.b.3-dfsg-2ubuntu3:
- SHA passes
- `make check` passes all tests
- All Futon tests pass in Chromium 10 and Firefox 3.6.16, though
Firefox still doesn't like losing focus when running tests (keeps
hanging the browser with "unresponsive script" dialogs).
- Root URL signature is correct
Unfortunately there is still no mention of the added dependency on
jQuery UI and related work from COUCHDB-1131
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1095523). We need
to make dependencies like this clear as they roll out in releases.
-1
Cheers,
--
Sam Bisbee
www.sbisbee.com
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
>
[VOTE RESULTS] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
The final tally of the vote is:
15 +1 votes
This exceeds the required minimum three +1 votes and the proposal passes.
I shall prepare the release as soon as possible.
The individual votes are as follows:
+1 Randall Leeds:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimwGa4L2nY_Ga6HpAMHAMfxpvr=Cg@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Paul Davis:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CA5D86857-7F27-47B4-9392-4E92B1EBE080@gmail.com%3E
+1 Till Klampaeckel:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTimrafkBByDvQ97vSmcpGUxDMkTtCQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Dave Cottlehuber:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTi=-tt6EjgF1aCag+8LBqWCVQpRxmw@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Dirkjan Ochtman:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTinFE5eXeXekzSVetFAOa2XWcwYQ0A@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Jan Lehnardt:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3C871C4834-0252-428A-B4C8-85C2CA1C09F9@apache.org%3E
+1 Benoit Chesneau:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTin2QFLg-Tb=TkNcULXnwkXqHqTTvg@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Robert Dionne:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3C6628DAED-C4E5-4E6D-8873-F9E492E31F43@dionne-associates.com%3E
+1 Filipe David Manana:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTik80kwNYsq+pP8mviMLyvyhM=qaAQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Sam Bisbee:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3CBANLkTikZS=TtCUam0HPuFKKrWBk8WQT8kg@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Sebastian Cohnen:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201105.mbox/%3C21358EB2-DEC6-4A27-AF3C-F9B31EAD6059@googlemail.com%3E
+1 Noah Slater:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3C6BF4674D-1161-44D7-925E-E252CB358A70@apache.org%3E
+1 Adam Kocoloski:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3CB343261E-6A74-4A92-B098-A76C98BC6306@apache.org%3E
+0 Peter Nolan:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTinSa29WERzGEgWCqktDEPmbhkAuVA@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Robert Newson:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTimvdyUMSV+GN5cZx6Skoo=yfWkTuQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
+1 Chris Anderson:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201106.mbox/%3CBANLkTinCwVTJMdBwnXtEuesiWEQYuNLBsQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
Thanks to everyone who voted.
B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 11:09, Robert Dionne wrote:
> Chris,
>
> This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of "make check". They serve a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the browser.
>
> I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend.
Related:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201010.mbox/%3c4897047E-3C28-4FF4-900F-FF564BBC3D80@apache.org%3e
I still intend to commit this once 1.1.0 is out :)
Cheers
Jan
--
>
> Best,
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
>> small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
>> (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
>> version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
>> suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow
>> itself.
>>
>> I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically
>> stock macbook air).
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>>
>>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>>
>>> Could be. :)
>>>
>>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>>
>>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Chris Anderson
>> http://jchrisa.net
>> http://couchbase.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
Chris,
This is an excellent idea. Currently the entire suite of browser tests are also run from the command line, where we overload the CouchDB definition and use couchjs. We could break the suite out with a subset staying in share/www/script/test to be used as you suggest, and the lion's share of them moving to test/javascript to be run as part of "make check". They serve a great role in testing end-end but go a little too far in making use of the browser.
I'll take a closer look at this over the weekend.
Best,
Bob
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
> I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
> small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
> (useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
> version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
> suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow
> itself.
>
> I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically
> stock macbook air).
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1.
>
> Chris
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>
>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>
>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>
>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>
>> Could be. :)
>>
>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>
>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchrisa.net
> http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>.
I agree, the browser tests should move to the command line, and a
small subset (30 seconds tops) of tests should be in the browser
(useful for debugging proxy config, installation, spidermonkey
version, or whatever. I'd rather not block 1.1 on rewriting the test
suite, even though I agree the browser suite has started to outgrow
itself.
I am happy to report that all tests pass on my machine (basically
stock macbook air).
+1 from me.
Thanks to everyone who helped with 1.1.
Chris
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>
>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>
>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>
>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>
> Could be. :)
>
> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>
> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>
>
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couchbase.com
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:29, Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?
>
4.0.1
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
>> versions of the test scripts cached.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>>>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could be. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>>>>
>>>>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
>>>> excellent HTTP support.
>>>
>>> <insertwittyreply>
>>>
>>> (I've got nothing)
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
What version of FF? 3.5 or newer?
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
> versions of the test scripts cached.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Could be. :)
>>>>
>>>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>>>
>>>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
>>> excellent HTTP support.
>>
>> <insertwittyreply>
>>
>> (I've got nothing)
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 14:38, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does
> a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The
> Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but
> then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it
> actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe
> it is the "wait for restart" routine that has a bug or triggers
> one inside Firefox.
Oh yes, restarting Firefox and running new tests works.
CouchDB is sat there, happily waiting to requests.
The problem is with the test code.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 15:13, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>>
>>> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
>>> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
>>
>> Nope, nothing.
>>
>>
> If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser.
I've seen this in the past occasionally, where the test suite does
a _restart and then waits forever for CouchDB to come back. The
Erlang console will show the regular startup procedure output, but
then it just waits there for requests. I have verified that it
actually *does* accept requests when it is in this state. Maybe
it is the "wait for restart" routine that has a bug or triggers
one inside Firefox.
From the log:
...
[info] [<0.2219.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /_restart 200 # _restart
[info] [<0.2202.0>] Stopping all ongoing replications because the replicator database was deleted or changed
Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 (LogLevel=info) is starting. # startup logs
Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax. # cnt'd
[info] [<0.2274.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/ # hangs here
[info] [<0.2790.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' / 200 # verified that CouchDB accepts requests
FWIW, this is the delayed_commits test.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
>> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
>> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
>
> Nope, nothing.
>
>
If Chrome passed fine I'm guessing the error is in the browser.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 2 Jun 2011, at 09:38, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> @nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
> erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
Nope, nothing.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
Top posting to Bob's top posting, same for me. FF 4.0.1 has been fine
on R14B01 / 03 also, when I remember to clear cache. Chrome also seems
to be fine & I've had no issues with safari current mac version either
but not tested either systematically.
@nslater when "it hangs" is there anything of note happening in the
erlang logs/shell ? Throw us a bone!
A+
Dave
<insert smiley of choice here>
On 2 June 2011 09:40, Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite
> passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is
> fixed).
>
> B.
>
> On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Just tangentially FYI:
>>
>> From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version:
>>
>> http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
>>>
>>>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
>>>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
>>>> versions of the test scripts cached.
>>>
>>> I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
mostly for fun, I did more testing than our standard procedure to even
begin each round of this releasel
+1
Mac OS X 10.6.7, erlang R14B03, firefox 4.0.1
digests and sigs verified.
make check and Futon all clear (have to clear cache, though).
As part of preparing for round 3 I ran all the above tests (and more)
on R14B01 and R14B02 as well.
B.
On 2 June 2011 09:50, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :)
>
> Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the
> procedure and tell you what is expected or not:
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Let us know if you have any questions :)
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote:
>
>> well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
>> an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
>> in this couch 'game'.
>>
>> With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
>> vote should have marginal weight.
>>
>> To quote, the streets
>>
>> lets push things forward.
>>
>>
>> +0
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi Peter,
thanks for cheering from the sidelines, you vote is most welcome :)
Here's a link that should get you up to speed with the
procedure and tell you what is expected or not:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Let us know if you have any questions :)
Cheers
Jan
--
On 2 Jun 2011, at 04:26, Peter Nolan wrote:
> well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
> an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
> in this couch 'game'.
>
> With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
> vote should have marginal weight.
>
> To quote, the streets
>
> lets push things forward.
>
>
> +0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Peter Nolan <pe...@gmail.com>.
well, i view myself as neither an active player nor a sidelined player but
an eager first row fan in this community that looks forward to the advances
in this couch 'game'.
With minimal understanding of what would/wouldn't make a good release, my
vote should have marginal weight.
To quote, the streets
lets push things forward.
+0
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 23:43, Peter Nolan wrote:
> /me votes 'present'.
FYI, this vote will not be counted, if that is what you intended.
You need to provide an Apache style vote.
Preferably with a reason!
:)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Peter Nolan <pe...@gmail.com>.
/me votes 'present'.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
I'll note that I exclusively use firefox 4.0.1 and the test suite
passes reliably in it of R14B01/02/03 (now that the replication bug is
fixed).
B.
On 1 June 2011 21:55, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just tangentially FYI:
>
> From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version:
>
> http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
>
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
>>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
>>> versions of the test scripts cached.
>>
>> I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Just tangentially FYI:
From the collected test suite reports, I compiled this list of reports by success or failure per browser and version:
http://friendpaste.com/6GBZiLCVRF3t4JcLFqLKQ9
Cheers
Jan
--
On 1 Jun 2011, at 22:48, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
>
>> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
>> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
>> versions of the test scripts cached.
>
> I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:28, Randall Leeds wrote:
> FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
> Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
> versions of the test scripts cached.
I tried this and it hangs on replicate_db forever.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
FWIW I've had no trouble running the tests in Firefox.
Do make sure to clear your cache though, in case the browser has old
versions of the test scripts cached.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 13:19, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>>
>>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>>
>>> Could be. :)
>>>
>>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>>
>>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
>> excellent HTTP support.
>
> <insertwittyreply>
>
> (I've got nothing)
>
> --
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 21:47, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>>
>>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>>
>>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>>
>>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>>
>> Could be. :)
>>
>> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>>
>> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>>
>>
>
> I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
> excellent HTTP support.
<insertwittyreply>
(I've got nothing)
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>>
>>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>>
>>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>>
>> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
>> 4 is also most of the issue.
>
> Could be. :)
>
> DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
>
> (I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
>
>
I think we should rewrite all the tests in Scala because of its
excellent HTTP support.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 20:41, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>>
>> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>>
>> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
>
> Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
> 4 is also most of the issue.
Could be. :)
DOWN WITH ALL NON-DETERMINISTIC BROWSER TESTS, I SAY!
(I, for one, welcome our new etap overlords.)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
>
> I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
>
> Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
Also, our documented test browser is FF3.5. I wonder if the update to
4 is also most of the issue.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Considering that the tests work with Chrome, I'm going to change my vote to +1 now.
I am also suggesting that we change our recommended test browser to Chrome.
Firefox 4 seems to have a lot of trouble with it.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:21, Paul Davis wrote:
> This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
> seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
> check if couch was still running?
Couch was running, and the tests afterwards all passed.
>> auth_cache fails
>>
>> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>>
>> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>>
>
> This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep
> button usually fixes it.
Should the tests work around this?
>> cookie_auth fails
>>
>> "error": "file_exists"
>>
>
> Didn't we just fix this?
Evidently not. ;)
>> Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
>>
>> I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
>
> I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue
> that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do
> you? That can screw with things.
I don't even have it installed!
Just ran the tests in Chrome and they all pass.
What gives?
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rev_stemming
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rewrite
> error
> 10ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> security_validation
> error
> 6ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> show_documents
> error
> 11ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> stats
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> update_documents
> error
> 5ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> users_db
> error
> 4ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
This usually indicates that something broked on the server. I've only
seen it in corner cases where I segfault in a NIF or similar. Did you
check if couch was still running?
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
This is related to browser cache. Command-Shift-R and the cache sweep
button usually fixes it.
> cookie_auth fails
>
> "error": "file_exists"
>
Didn't we just fix this?
> Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
>
> I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
I ran them on Chrome and they passed just fine. Perhaps its a FF issue
that no-one has noticed yet. Also, you don't have Firebug turned on do
you? That can screw with things.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
On 1 Jun 2011, at 19:19, Robert Dionne wrote:
> Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing?
>
>> Everything else looks okay though.
Yep. :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
Noah,
Does "make check" run with all the etaps passing?
Bob
On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
>
> Unit tests fail for me.
>
> -
>
> replicator_db
> error
> 3001ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rev_stemming
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> rewrite
> error
> 10ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> security_validation
> error
> 6ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> show_documents
> error
> 11ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> stats
> error
> 7ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> update_documents
> error
> 5ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> users_db
> error
> 4ms
> Run with debugger
> • Exception raised: {}
>
> -
>
> Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.
>
> The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be.
>
> -
>
> After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.
>
> Very weird.
>
> Going to run the whole test suite again.
>
> —
>
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
> cookie_auth fails
>
> "error": "file_exists"
>
> The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
>
> Killing Firefox and trying again.
>
> —
>
> auth_cache fails
>
> assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
>
> assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
>
> The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
>
> Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.
>
> Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.
>
> I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.
>
> So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.
>
> —
>
> Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.
>
> Running through all the tests manually from the start.
>
> cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.
>
> Ran with debug:
>
> Exception raised: {"message":"ddoc is null","fileName":"http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js","lineNumber":41,"stack":"()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\"test_suite_users\", {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \"false\"});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var ddoc = usersDb.open(\"_design/_auth\");T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password = \"3.141592653589\";var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"Jason Davies\", roles: [\"dev\"]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \"Jason Davies\");var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jchris@apache.org\"}, \"funnybone\");T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jchris@apache.org\"}, \"eh, Boo-Boo?\");try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false && \"Can't create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"conflict\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"_why\"}, \"copperfield\");try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't create underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"foo\"}, \"bar\");badIdDoc._id = \"org.apache.couchdb:w00x\";try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false && \"Can't create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"Jason Davies\", password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason Davies\");var xhr = CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session\", {headers: {'Content-Type': \"application/json\"}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \"Jason Davies\", password: password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason Davies\");jasonUserDoc.foo = 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't delete other users docs. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\"Jason Davies\", \"2.71828\").ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\"Robert Allen Zimmerman\", \"d00d\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \"Jason Davies\");xhr = CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session?next=/\", {headers: {'Content-Type': \"application/x-www-form-urlencoded\"}, body: \"name=Jason%20Davies&password=\" + encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200) {T(/Welcome/.test(xhr.responseText));} else {T(xhr.status == 302);T(xhr.getResponseHeader(\"Location\"));}T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.length == 0);jasonUserDoc.foo = 3;try {usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't update someone else's user doc. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}jchrisUserDoc.roles = [\"foo\"];try {usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't set roles unless you are admin. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles[0] == \"_admin\");jchrisUserDoc.foo = [\"foo\"];T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);jchrisUserDoc.roles = [\"_bar\"];try {usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't add system roles to user's db. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") == -1);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles[0] == \"_admin\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == null);run_on_modified_server([{section: \"admins\", key: \"jchris@apache.org\", value: \"funnybone\"}], function () {T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") != -1);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);jchrisUserDoc = usersDb.open(jchrisUserDoc._id);delete jchrisUserDoc.salt;delete jchrisUserDoc.password_sha;T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);var s = CouchDB.session();T(s.userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(s.userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") != -1);T(s.info.authenticated == \"cookie\");T(s.info.authentication_db == \"test_suite_users\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);});} finally {T(CouchDB.logout().ok);}}))@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:375\u000a(true)@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:253\u000arun(0)@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:91\u000a"}
>
> Froze on replicate_db again.
>
> —
>
> Everything else looks okay though.
>
> Heh.
>
> Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
>
> I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Reinstalled Erlang and the weird SSL problems went away.
Unit tests fail for me.
-
replicator_db
error
3001ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rev_stemming
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
rewrite
error
10ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
security_validation
error
6ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
show_documents
error
11ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
stats
error
7ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
update_documents
error
5ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
users_db
error
4ms
Run with debugger
• Exception raised: {}
-
Tried to re-run these tests in with debug on, but Firefox locked up.
The tests lock up on me all the time. And I don't mean, while they're running through, as expected. When they fail, or I try to restart one, basically, the whole thing just freezes. I never seem to be able to do much more, other than restart Firefox. I'm not sure why this happens, but I really wish it wouldn't. Makes testing harder than it could be.
-
After restarting Firefox all these tests pass.
Very weird.
Going to run the whole test suite again.
—
auth_cache fails
assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
cookie_auth fails
"error": "file_exists"
The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
Killing Firefox and trying again.
—
auth_cache fails
assertion misses_after == misses_before +1 failed
assertion hits_after == hits_before failed
The test suite then hung on replicator_db again.
Killing Firefox and trying again, manually.
Note I was not able to get debug output because the test suite hangs Firefox.
I don't see anything happening in the CouchDB log either.
So my best guess is that Firefox is just looping over something mindlessly.
—
Running auth_cache manually lots of times produces no errors.
Running through all the tests manually from the start.
cookie_auth fails again for the same reason.
Ran with debug:
Exception raised: {"message":"ddoc is null","fileName":"http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js","lineNumber":41,"stack":"()@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:41\u000arun_on_modified_server([object Array],(function () {try {var usersDb = new CouchDB(\"test_suite_users\", {'X-Couch-Full-Commit': \"false\"});usersDb.deleteDb();usersDb.createDb();var ddoc = usersDb.open(\"_design/_auth\");T(ddoc.validate_doc_update);var password = \"3.141592653589\";var jasonUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"Jason Davies\", roles: [\"dev\"]}, password);T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);var checkDoc = usersDb.open(jasonUserDoc._id);T(checkDoc.name == \"Jason Davies\");var jchrisUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jchris@apache.org\"}, \"funnybone\");T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);var duplicateJchrisDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"jchris@apache.org\"}, \"eh, Boo-Boo?\");try {usersDb.save(duplicateJchrisDoc);T(false && \"Can't create duplicate user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"conflict\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 409);}var underscoreUserDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"_why\"}, \"copperfield\");try {usersDb.save(underscoreUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't create underscore user names. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}var badIdDoc = CouchDB.prepareUserDoc({name: \"foo\"}, \"bar\");badIdDoc._id = \"org.apache.couchdb:w00x\";try {usersDb.save(badIdDoc);T(false && \"Can't create malformed docids. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"Jason Davies\", password).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason Davies\");var xhr = CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session\", {headers: {'Content-Type': \"application/json\"}, body: JSON.stringify({name: \"Jason Davies\", password: password})});T(JSON.parse(xhr.responseText).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"Jason Davies\");jasonUserDoc.foo = 2;T(usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") == -1);try {usersDb.deleteDoc(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't delete other users docs. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(!CouchDB.login(\"Jason Davies\", \"2.71828\").ok);T(!CouchDB.login(\"Robert Allen Zimmerman\", \"d00d\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name != \"Jason Davies\");xhr = CouchDB.request(\"POST\", \"/_session?next=/\", {headers: {'Content-Type': \"application/x-www-form-urlencoded\"}, body: \"name=Jason%20Davies&password=\" + encodeURIComponent(password)});if (xhr.status == 200) {T(/Welcome/.test(xhr.responseText));} else {T(xhr.status == 302);T(xhr.getResponseHeader(\"Location\"));}T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.length == 0);jasonUserDoc.foo = 3;try {usersDb.save(jasonUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't update someone else's user doc. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}jchrisUserDoc.roles = [\"foo\"];try {usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't set roles unless you are admin. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles[0] == \"_admin\");jchrisUserDoc.foo = [\"foo\"];T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);jchrisUserDoc.roles = [\"_bar\"];try {usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc);T(false && \"Can't add system roles to user's db. Should have thrown an error.\");} catch (e) {T(e.error == \"forbidden\");T(usersDb.last_req.status == 403);}T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") == -1);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles[0] == \"_admin\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == null);run_on_modified_server([{section: \"admins\", key: \"jchris@apache.org\", value: \"funnybone\"}], function () {T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") != -1);T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);jchrisUserDoc = usersDb.open(jchrisUserDoc._id);delete jchrisUserDoc.salt;delete jchrisUserDoc.password_sha;T(usersDb.save(jchrisUserDoc).ok);T(CouchDB.logout().ok);T(CouchDB.login(\"jchris@apache.org\", \"funnybone\").ok);var s = CouchDB.session();T(s.userCtx.name == \"jchris@apache.org\");T(s.userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"_admin\") != -1);T(s.info.authenticated == \"cookie\");T(s.info.authentication_db == \"test_suite_users\");T(CouchDB.session().userCtx.roles.indexOf(\"foo\") != -1);});} finally {T(CouchDB.logout().ok);}}))@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:375\u000a(true)@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/test/cookie_auth.js:253\u000arun(0)@http://127.0.0.1:5985/_utils/script/couch_test_runner.js?0.11.0:91\u000a"}
Froze on replicate_db again.
—
Everything else looks okay though.
Heh.
Gonna give this -1 until we fix the unit tests.
I wonder whether anyone else runs the unit tests at all, sometimes! ;)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Sebastian Cohnen <se...@googlemail.com>.
OS X 10.6.7, Erlang R14B03
+1
* signatures: ok
* make check: ok
* browser test suite: Firefox 4.0.1 & Safari 5.0.5: ok
Great work!
On 31.05.2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 15:23, Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz> wrote:
> What Jan said!
> This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!
+1.
(I've tried the release and make check passes for me. I don't think
any of the browsers I run are supported for the Futon tests, so I'm
skipping those -- but most look good, anyway.)
Cheesr,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
On 31 May 2011 20:55, Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out.
What Jan said!
This release has been a real saga and you are awesome!!
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi Robert,
I want to second the others' gratitude for your help pushing 1.1.0 out.
On 31 May 2011, at 00:25, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
+1
Tested on Mac OS X 10.6.7, R14B02 and R14B03. Signatures, make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 and 4.0 all check out.
Tested on Ubuntu 10.04, R13B03. make check and the test suite in Firefox 3.6 all check out.
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by "Paul J. Davis" <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 here. Motions pass on latest OS X.
On May 30, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * Signature OK
> * MD5 OK
> * SHA1 OK
> * Make check OK
> * Futon OK
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>>
>> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>>
>> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
>> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>>
>> Please follow our test procedure:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>>
>> Happy voting,
>>
>> B.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
* Signature OK
* MD5 OK
* SHA1 OK
* Make check OK
* Futon OK
+1
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 15:25, Robert Newson <rn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 3.
>
> Two further issues have been resolved since round 2;
>
> 1) Compatibility with erlang R14B03.
> 2) Release tarball now works on Windows (with Cygwin).
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rnewson/dist/1.1.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.1.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.1.0
>
> Please follow our test procedure:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>
> Happy voting,
>
> B.
>