You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/01 08:08:01 UTC

Re: sshexec verbosity

Hi,

> this sounds like a good idea. I think we should check this in. It introduces
> a change compared with the last release but this sounds like a good change.
>
> Thoughts ?

As someone who has been grappling with ssh/scp issues over the last
few months (although not in a an Ant context), I couldn't agree more!

Also I was considering committing this change as my first real work on
the trunk in about a year :(

Kev

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: sshexec verbosity

Posted by lalyos <la...@yahoo.com>.
Hi,

I just provided the patch for the documentation here:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48317

Kev, if you could please commit it.
cheers,
lajos

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> this sounds like a good idea. I think we should check this in. It  
>>> introduces
>>> a change compared with the last release but this sounds like a  
>>> good change.
>>>
>>> Thoughts ?
>
> Committed fix/change in revision 885684
>
> I've tested it with some in house code here and it looks good to me.
> Any problems with this change, please feel free to revert (it's been
> so long since I've committed to the core/trunk compared to sandbox...)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Re: sshexec verbosity

Posted by Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Kevin Jackson <fo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> this sounds like a good idea. I think we should check this in. It introduces
>> a change compared with the last release but this sounds like a good change.
>>
>> Thoughts ?

Committed fix/change in revision 885684

I've tested it with some in house code here and it looks good to me.
Any problems with this change, please feel free to revert (it's been
so long since I've committed to the core/trunk compared to sandbox...)

Kev

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org