You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/10/11 00:22:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-17106) NameNode can timeout during initialization with dfs.datanode.volumes.replica-add.threadpool.size being 0

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18029135#comment-18029135 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17106:
---------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #6090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6090#issuecomment-3392652819

   We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
   If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
   Thanks all for your contribution.




> NameNode can timeout during initialization with dfs.datanode.volumes.replica-add.threadpool.size being 0
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-17106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17106
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: ConfX
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: reproduce.sh
>
>
> h2. What happened:
> When setting {{dfs.datanode.volumes.replica-add.threadpool.size}} to 0, HDFS cluster is never able to start and gets timed out eventually.
> h2. Buggy code:
> Still investigating
> h2. StackTrace:
> {noformat}
> java.io.IOException: Timed out waiting for Mini HDFS Cluster to start
>     at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.waitClusterUp(MiniDFSCluster.java:1503)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.initMiniDFSCluster(MiniDFSCluster.java:973)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster.<init>(MiniDFSCluster.java:576)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.MiniDFSCluster$Builder.build(MiniDFSCluster.java:518)
>     at org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics.setUp(TestNameNodeMetrics.java:166){noformat}
> h2. Reproduce:
> (1) Set {{dfs.datanode.volumes.replica-add.threadpool.size}} to 0
> (2) Run a simple test that exercises this parameter, e.g. {{org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.metrics.TestNameNodeMetrics#testExcessBlocks}}
> h2. Solution:
> If 0 is not a valid value, then it would be good to have a checker.
> For example like {{{}file.bytes-per-checksum{}}}, it has a checker to check it must be larger than 0.
> {noformat}
> Preconditions.checkState(bytesPerChecksum > 0, "bytes per checksum should be positive but was %s", bytesPerChecksum);{noformat}
> We could have similar checker
> {noformat}
> Preconditions.checkState(addReplicaThreadPool > 0, "addReplicaThreadPool should be positive but was %s", addReplicaThreadPool);{noformat}
> For an easy reproduction, run the reproduce.sh in the attachment. We are happy to provide a patch if this issue is confirmed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org