mod_ftp alpha/beta?

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
release out.

What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
look good.

Re: mod_ftp alpha/beta?

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On May 5, 2009, at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
>>> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
>>> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
>>> release out.
>>>
>>> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
>>> look good.
>>
>> See STATUS?
> 
> For an *alpha*?

Actually, a beta, but of course!  You ask for status, we point you to
status :)  Why would we revert to alpha anyways?

http://httpd.apache.org/download.html

Nothing substantial changed since the last release vote passed, only;

  *) Corrected logged count of bytes STORed or APPEnded when >4GB.
     [Jim Jagielski, William Rowe]

so if anyone is itching to fix this bug, I'm ok with another beta.

I see you just resolved the FTPLimit schema.  The .h's just need to be
corrected in order to bless this as release [it doesn't stop us at httpd
core, but I'd like to set a slightly higher bar for public/private APIs ;-]

We probably aught to resolve the low-numbered port binding which I believe
I know how to do without offending sensibilities [after reviewing the
voluminous complaints against mod_watchdog's initial design and behavior
within the parent process.]  If we overcame that unexpected restriction
(it would be sad to ship a ftp /release/ without addressing ports 22/21 ;-]
then I see no reason for this not to undergo a 1.0.0 release vote.

Re: mod_ftp alpha/beta?

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On May 5, 2009, at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
>> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
>> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
>> release out.
>>
>> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
>> look good.
>
> See STATUS?
>

For an *alpha*?

Re: mod_ftp alpha/beta?

[Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>]

I've been using it as fallback when I can't conenct to mine via webdav.

So far it's working ok, even vhosts but thats still a bit tricky but
works non-the-less.
I'd love to see it included for a 2.2.x but 2.4.x would be nice aswel.

~Jorge



On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:56 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
>> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
>> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
>> release out.
>>
>> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
>> look good.
>
> See STATUS?
>

Re: mod_ftp alpha/beta?

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On May 5, 2009, at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
>> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
>> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
>> release out.
>>
>> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
>> look good.
>
> See STATUS?
>

OK, the 1st is done :)

Re: mod_ftp alpha/beta?

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd like to work on a mod_ftp release to go along
> with the 2.2.12 release... I think baselining mod_ftp
> for only 2.2.x makes sense, and I'd really like to get a
> release out.
> 
> What's the status? I've done some prelim tests and they
> look good.

See STATUS?