RE: I would like to know what tomcat release bug 345 was deferred to, still doesn't seem to be fixed on tomcat 3.2.3

[GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr>]

>I would like to know the status of this bug and what release 
>it is going to
>be addressed in ?
>I found another person had filed bug 345 quite awhile back.  
>We need the
>proper date header response back to browser so it won't reload 
>staic files
>all the time. We don't want to use the IIS redirect as a way 
>around this.
>This issue did not seem to get fixed/addressed in tomcat 3.2.3 
>which we just
>tried out.

You're rigth, TC 3.2.3 and 3.3b1 didn't send the Date header.

Who's is commiters agree to add the Date headers in both http
connectors ? There is a hack in Date stuff which will avoid
spending too much time to generate the date !:

>Here is a description of bug #345.
>
>Their is no date header in the Tomcat generated response, this
>is critical in case Tomcat is not running behind Apache e.g.
>
>According to the HTTP specs (RFC 2616) the Date header MUST be
>included by the origin server.
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From Marc Saegesser
><ma...@apropos.com> 2001-03-21 11:46 -------
>This won't be addressed for Tomcat 3.2.2 but will be evaluated 
>for a later 
>release.
>