Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

[Dave Reynolds <da...@gmail.com>]

On 29/02/12 21:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Please vote to approve this release:
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...

+1

[Checked signatures, NOTICE et al, source buildable, tests pass, 
directory structure meets i-g list requests.
  A naive
     grep -L "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation"
threw up shell scripts in bin and bin-test but those do have short-form 
license headers.]

Dave

Re: [VOTE] Release Jena TDB 0.9.0 (RC-5)

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

On 02/03/12 11:41, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> On 29/02/12 21:41, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>
> +1

Thank you.

>
> [Checked signatures, NOTICE et al, source buildable, tests pass,
> directory structure meets i-g list requests.
> A naive
> grep -L "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation"
> threw up shell scripts in bin and bin-test but those do have short-form
> license headers.]

I have been grep'ping  for the URL:
    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

I've also run the RAT over the source-release files.

	Andy

>
> Dave

Hmm -- the version number of RAT does not include "-incubator" in the 
jar version number, but is in the binaries and sources filename.