You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Andre Fischer <af...@a-w-f.de> on 2011/12/09 09:47:41 UTC
Buildbot
Hi,
I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the Linux
buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
Great work.
I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
messages in the build logs
(http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
several uploads but I can not see their targets.
Best regards,
Andre
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@googlemail.com>.
On 12/9/11 9:53 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
>> three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the
>> Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
>>
>> Great work.
>>
>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
>> messages in the build logs
>> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
>
> Greetings Raphael
>
>
great news
I saw that we build the URE as a standalone product. I would like to
propose that we delete this product because i don't think that we want
to support it as standalone product in the future.
As one of the initial UNO developers i liked very much that UNO were
used outside of the office. But i think the usage today is very seldom
and goes to zero.
So let us focus on the office and let us remove the URE as standalone
product or at least let stop us to build it every time.
Any opinions?
Juergen
Re: Buildbot
Posted by eric b <er...@free.fr>.
Hi,
Le 9 déc. 11 à 22:43, Andrew Rist a écrit :
>
>
> On 12/9/2011 4:53 AM, RGB ES wrote:
>> 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher<r....@gmx.ch>
>>
>>> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I
>>> can see
>>>> messages in the build logs (http://ci.apache.org/builders/
>>>> openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>>>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>>>>
>>> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/
>>> install/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/>
>>>
>>>
>> I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
> Building on Ubuntu at this point (thus the debs). Is there an
> option that will generate rpms on Ubu? Or do we have to do a build
> on RedHat or equiv?
If nobody modified since 3.2.x, to build rpm on Ubuntu, you can :
1) install rpm , librpm and probably rpmbuild or something like that
2) use --with-package-format="deb rpm" at configure time
If I'm not wrong, in configure.in, default is set to deb on Debian or
Ubuntu, but you can add other package formats if you are sure you can
build them.
HTH
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 12/9/2011 4:53 AM, RGB ES wrote:
> 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher<r....@gmx.ch>
>
>> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>
>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
>>> messages in the build logs (
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>>>
>> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/install/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/>
>>
>>
> I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
Building on Ubuntu at this point (thus the debs). Is there an option
that will generate rpms on Ubu? Or do we have to do a build on RedHat
or equiv?
A.
>
> Cheers
> Ricardo
>
--
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
OracleCorporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>.
Am 17.12.11 15:04, schrieb RGB ES:
> 2011/12/13 RGB ES<rg...@gmail.com>
>
>> Wops! I just discovered that the package with "arc" in the name is just
>> the install directory tree, so it is possible to just unpack the whole
>> thing and use it by clicking on the scripts on .../openoffice.org3/program/
>>
>> BTW, how to report problems with those builds? Using BZ is OK or do we
>> need to comment the problems here? For example, with today build (12
>> December) any time I try to dock the Stylist or the Navigator Writer crash.
>>
>>
> On all builds I tried, every time I insert a SVG with Insert → Image → From
> file AOO Crash. If I drag-n-drop the SVG it do not crash, but the edit area
> get locked: all menus can be opened and the dialogues appears, but the edit
> area do not repaint. There is no message on the command line: it just
> quits. Is this a know issue?
> I'm on openSUSE 11.4, 64 bits.
Same for Windows Vista.
>
> Cheers
> Ricardo
>
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Mechtilde,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 09:00:58PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> > try the arc file, it does not need to be installed, you just untar the
> > file; and the user directory is created inside, so you can try it on
> > parallel with other versions.
> > http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US-2011-12-16.tar.gz
>
> thanks for your answer
>
> but this build failed after starting with
>
> [Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx)
> javaldx failed 1]+ Exit 77
>
I try it, and it works. It looks like a permission issue. Did you unpack
it to a directory where you have read-write access?
Try changing the user directory permissions:
]$ chmod 770 OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US/openoffice.org3/.openoffice.org
If I change the permissions to 666 I can reproduce your issue:
]$ chmod 666 OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US/openoffice.org3/.openoffice.org
]$ OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US/openoffice.org3/program/soffice
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx).
javaldx failed!
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ariel
Am 17.12.2011 20:53, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi Mechtilde, *
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:18:26PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
>> which build did you test on which maschine?
>>
>> where do you get it from
>
> I test on my own builds.
>
>> I tried to install the build from
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/ under debian 64 bit.
>>
>> It failed with the error message:
>>
>> "Paket-Architektur (x86_64) passt nicht zum System (amd64)"
>>
>> translated to English: "The packet architecture (x86_64) doesn't fit to
>> the system (amd64)"
>>
>> Can someone give me a hint?
>
> try the arc file, it does not need to be installed, you just untar the
> file; and the user directory is created inside, so you can try it on
> parallel with other versions.
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US-2011-12-16.tar.gz
thanks for your answer
but this build failed after starting with
[Java framework] Error in function createSettingsDocument (elements.cxx)
javaldx failed 1]+ Exit 77
> @Andrew Rist: it seems the buildbot is using the system EPM, and is
> generating packages that don't follow the debian naming scheme.
>
> If so, it can be fixed by using a *patched* epm 3.7 version
> http://www.epmhome.org/software.php?VERSION=4.2&FILE=epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.bz2
> patched with this patch:
> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/raw-file/c904c1944462/epm/epm-3.7.patch
>
> The patch fixes the wrong naming scheme, for example:
> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/file/c904c1944462/epm/epm-3.7.patch#l203
Then I will wait for a build after this patch
Kind regards
Mechtilde
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7s9PkACgkQucZfh1OziSvRmACeLpUBAWx4K2lVKATvZTDZXi7M
xxcAn3eODtyaXb34CDggoXTH/UFDPHKE
=2j2A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Mechtilde, *
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:18:26PM +0100, Mechtilde wrote:
> which build did you test on which maschine?
>
> where do you get it from
I test on my own builds.
> I tried to install the build from
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/ under debian 64 bit.
>
> It failed with the error message:
>
> "Paket-Architektur (x86_64) passt nicht zum System (amd64)"
>
> translated to English: "The packet architecture (x86_64) doesn't fit to
> the system (amd64)"
>
> Can someone give me a hint?
try the arc file, it does not need to be installed, you just untar the
file; and the user directory is created inside, so you can try it on
parallel with other versions.
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/OOo_3.4.0_Linux_x86-64_install-arc_en-US-2011-12-16.tar.gz
@Andrew Rist: it seems the buildbot is using the system EPM, and is
generating packages that don't follow the debian naming scheme.
If so, it can be fixed by using a *patched* epm 3.7 version
http://www.epmhome.org/software.php?VERSION=4.2&FILE=epm/3.7/epm-3.7-source.tar.bz2
patched with this patch:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/raw-file/c904c1944462/epm/epm-3.7.patch
The patch fixes the wrong naming scheme, for example:
http://hg.services.openoffice.org/OOO340/file/c904c1944462/epm/epm-3.7.patch#l203
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Mechtilde <oo...@mechtilde.de>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ariel,
which build did you test on which maschine?
where do you get it from
I tried to install the build from
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/ under debian 64 bit.
It failed with the error message:
"Paket-Architektur (x86_64) passt nicht zum System (amd64)"
translated to English: "The packet architecture (x86_64) doesn't fit to
the system (amd64)"
Can someone give me a hint?
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 17.12.2011 19:55, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
>> On all builds I tried, every time I insert a SVG with Insert ? Image ? From
>> file AOO Crash. If I drag-n-drop the SVG it do not crash, but the edit area
>> get locked: all menus can be opened and the dialogues appears, but the edit
>> area do not repaint. There is no message on the command line: it just
>> quits.
>
> I see a crash in both scenarios:
>
> * Insert - Image - From file
> * Drag and drop from the file browser
>
> I can't reproduce your second one.
>
>> Is this a know issue?
>
> svg support has been disabled, as it was copy-left. You shouldn't try to
> insert an svg file! ;)
>
> * Revision 1200879 removed the component implementation, but forgot to
> remove it from component passive registration file
> * RenderGraphicRasterizer::InitializeRasterizer tries to instantiate the
> component, this should be in a try-catch block
>
> I guess a cleaner fix would be remove completely svg from the graphic filter
> configuration, so that the user can not even try to insert an svg file.
> I'll commit the trivial fix, please try tomorrow with tonight's nightly
> build.
>
>
> Regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7s6wIACgkQucZfh1OziStxfACdHWzbgb5ms1kQ41AOco1IN0C/
TxoAoIIc7UXy5xbGpe7m7vziKJJFQCZt
=98Qz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:18:28PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> 2011/12/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
>
> > svg support has been disabled, as it was copy-left. You shouldn't try to
> > insert an svg file! ;)
> >
> So the native implementation (1) is not merged yet?
> (1)
> http://eric.bachard.org/news/index.php?post/2011/12/03/In-progress-%3A-native-support-of-the-SVG-graphic-format-in-Apache-OpenOffice.org
not yet, it's on a feature branch.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/17 Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>
> svg support has been disabled, as it was copy-left. You shouldn't try to
> insert an svg file! ;)
>
> So the native implementation (1) is not merged yet?
> I'll commit the trivial fix, please try tomorrow with tonight's nightly
> build.
>
I'll be on a plane tomorrow, so I'll try on Friday ;)
(1)
http://eric.bachard.org/news/index.php?post/2011/12/03/In-progress-%3A-native-support-of-the-SVG-graphic-format-in-Apache-OpenOffice.org
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Ricardo,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 03:04:21PM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> On all builds I tried, every time I insert a SVG with Insert → Image → From
> file AOO Crash. If I drag-n-drop the SVG it do not crash, but the edit area
> get locked: all menus can be opened and the dialogues appears, but the edit
> area do not repaint. There is no message on the command line: it just
> quits.
I see a crash in both scenarios:
* Insert - Image - From file
* Drag and drop from the file browser
I can't reproduce your second one.
> Is this a know issue?
svg support has been disabled, as it was copy-left. You shouldn't try to
insert an svg file! ;)
* Revision 1200879 removed the component implementation, but forgot to
remove it from component passive registration file
* RenderGraphicRasterizer::InitializeRasterizer tries to instantiate the
component, this should be in a try-catch block
I guess a cleaner fix would be remove completely svg from the graphic filter
configuration, so that the user can not even try to insert an svg file.
I'll commit the trivial fix, please try tomorrow with tonight's nightly
build.
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/13 RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>
> Wops! I just discovered that the package with "arc" in the name is just
> the install directory tree, so it is possible to just unpack the whole
> thing and use it by clicking on the scripts on .../openoffice.org3/program/
>
> BTW, how to report problems with those builds? Using BZ is OK or do we
> need to comment the problems here? For example, with today build (12
> December) any time I try to dock the Stylist or the Navigator Writer crash.
>
>
On all builds I tried, every time I insert a SVG with Insert → Image → From
file AOO Crash. If I drag-n-drop the SVG it do not crash, but the edit area
get locked: all menus can be opened and the dialogues appears, but the edit
area do not repaint. There is no message on the command line: it just
quits. Is this a know issue?
I'm on openSUSE 11.4, 64 bits.
Cheers
Ricardo
RE: Buildbot
Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RGB ES [mailto:rgb.mldc@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 December 2011 10:14 AM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Buildbot
>
> 2011/12/9 RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>
>
> > 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>
> >
> >> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
> >>
> >> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can
> >> see
> >>> messages in the build logs (
> >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
> >>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
> >>>
> >> They are here -->
> >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/install/<http://ci.apache.
> >> org/projects/openoffice/install/>
> >>
> >>
> > I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
> >
> >
> Wops! I just discovered that the package with "arc" in the name is just
the
> install directory tree, so it is possible to just unpack the whole thing
and use it
> by clicking on the scripts on .../openoffice.org3/program/
>
> BTW, how to report problems with those builds? Using BZ is OK or do we
> need to comment the problems here? For example, with today build (12
> December) any time I try to dock the Stylist or the Navigator Writer
crash.
Nightly builds are use at your own risk (even for devs!) so unless it
persist over
several builds I wouldn't bother reporting.
Gav...
>
> Cheers
> Ricardo
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:24:32AM +0100, eric b wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 13 déc. 11 à 03:24, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
>
> >To people building AOO: The attached patch reverts all changes, it
> >only keeps the license header change. Please try if it works (it
> >does on Linux/Fedora 16).
> >
>
> Please keep the english comments. At least we can understand them.
according to Eike, the translation does not make much sense
http://s.apache.org/6y8
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by eric b <er...@free.fr>.
Hi,
Le 13 déc. 11 à 03:24, Ariel Constenla-Haile a écrit :
> To people building AOO: The attached patch reverts all changes, it
> only keeps the license header change. Please try if it works (it
> does on Linux/Fedora 16).
>
Please keep the english comments. At least we can understand them.
Thanks,
Eric
--
qɔᴉɹə
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog : http://eric.bachard.org/news
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>.
Hello Ricardo,
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 01:14:28AM +0100, RGB ES wrote:
> 2011/12/9 RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>
>
> > 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>
> >
> >> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
> >>
> >> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
> >>> messages in the build logs (
> >>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
> >>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
> >>>
> >> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/install/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/>
> >>
> >>
> > I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
> >
> >
> Wops! I just discovered that the package with "arc" in the name is just the
> install directory tree, so it is possible to just unpack the whole thing
> and use it by clicking on the scripts on .../openoffice.org3/program/
>
> BTW, how to report problems with those builds? Using BZ is OK or do we need
> to comment the problems here? For example, with today build (12 December)
> any time I try to dock the Stylist or the Navigator Writer crash.
This issue was introduced by applying
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112795
This makes me think the patch was applied without even testing it
following the steps described in
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=112795#c0
Steps to reproduce:
1. start impress
2. open navigator
3. dock it to the right of the right pane <==== CRASH!
4. quit impress
[...]
I wonder if other issues had been introducing by applying patches from
bugzilla without any QA... Someone should take the work to QA each patch
was committed without previous testing (assuming that a list of those
patches is easy to get from bugzilla).
To people building AOO: The attached patch reverts all changes, it only
keeps the license header change. Please try if it works (it does on
Linux/Fedora 16).
Regards
--
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina
Re: Buildbot
Posted by RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/9 RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>
> 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>
>
>> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>
>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
>>> messages in the build logs (
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>>>
>> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/install/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/>
>>
>>
> I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
>
>
Wops! I just discovered that the package with "arc" in the name is just the
install directory tree, so it is possible to just unpack the whole thing
and use it by clicking on the scripts on .../openoffice.org3/program/
BTW, how to report problems with those builds? Using BZ is OK or do we need
to comment the problems here? For example, with today build (12 December)
any time I try to dock the Stylist or the Navigator Writer crash.
Cheers
Ricardo
Re: Buildbot
Posted by RGB ES <rg...@gmail.com>.
2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>
> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>
> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
>> messages in the build logs (
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>>
> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/**openoffice/install/<http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/>
>
>
I can only find deb files there. Any plans to build rpm too?
Cheers
Ricardo
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On Dec 10, 2011, at 4:51 AM, Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu> wrote:
> 2011.12.09. 9:53 keltezéssel, Raphael Bircher írta:
>> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
>>>
>>> Great work.
>>>
>>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see messages in the build logs (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
>>
>> Greetings Raphael
> I found only 64 bit version, any plan to build x86 32bit version?
> I can only test 32bit version in virtualbox/ubuntu 32bit, or opensuse 32bit (rpm based).
32 bit is on my mental list. I've been working on other platforms first.
Andrew
> Thanks,
> Zoltan
>>
>>
>
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Reizinger Zoltán <zr...@hdsnet.hu>.
2011.12.09. 9:53 keltezéssel, Raphael Bircher írta:
> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
>> three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the
>> Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
>>
>> Great work.
>>
>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can
>> see messages in the build logs
>> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
>
> Greetings Raphael
I found only 64 bit version, any plan to build x86 32bit version?
I can only test 32bit version in virtualbox/ubuntu 32bit, or opensuse
32bit (rpm based).
Thanks,
Zoltan
>
>
RE: Buildbot
Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhe Liu [mailto:aliuzhe@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 9 December 2011 7:21 PM
> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Buildbot
>
> Excellent.
> Anybody know when we can get Windows & Mac OS x build on buildbot?
Soon, working in it, with Andrew.
Gav...
>
> 2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>:
> > Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
> >> three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the
> >> Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
> >>
> >> Great work.
> >>
> >> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can
> >> see messages in the build logs
> >> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
> >> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
> >
> > They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
> >
> > Greetings Raphael
> >
> >
> > --
> > My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Zhe Liu <al...@gmail.com>.
Excellent.
Anybody know when we can get Windows & Mac OS x build on buildbot?
2011/12/9 Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>:
> Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for three
>> days in the row. That is really good news, both because the Linux buildbot
>> is running and that the last builds where successful.
>>
>> Great work.
>>
>> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
>> messages in the build logs
>> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
>> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
>
> They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
>
> Greetings Raphael
>
>
> --
> My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Raphael Bircher <r....@gmx.ch>.
Am 09.12.11 09:47, schrieb Andre Fischer:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
> three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the
> Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
>
> Great work.
>
> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
> messages in the build logs
> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
They are here --> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
Greetings Raphael
--
My private Homepage: http://www.raphaelbircher.ch/
Re: Buildbot
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 12/9/2011 12:47 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw that the buildbot has successfully built Linux builds for
> three days in the row. That is really good news, both because the
> Linux buildbot is running and that the last builds where successful.
>
> Great work.
>
> I still have a question: where are the results uploaded to? I can see
> messages in the build logs
> (http://ci.apache.org/builders/openofficeorg-nightly/builds/29) about
> several uploads but I can not see their targets.
I'm looking to create a 'nightlies index' page - it will link to all the
builds and resources.
Here are links to the build resources:
* logs (latest only) -
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html
* RAT report - http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html
* install bits (latest only) -
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/
At this point I am only storing the latest set of full logs, and the
latest successful set of install bits. This will probably change, but
we have to split the difference between keeping lots of versions and not
taking up too much disk space. Esp. with other platforms coming online,
we can generate a lot of bits quickly.
Andrew
>
> Best regards,
> Andre
--
Andrew Rist | Interoperability Architect
OracleCorporate Architecture Group
Redwood Shores, CA | 650.506.9847