You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2008/07/09 10:08:31 UTC

Using definitions.xml to define the available binding and implementation extensions?

There has been a few emails suggesting changing to use the definitions.xml
to define the available binding and implementation extensions, eg see [1],
[2], [3].

This seems quite a significant change over how things work today so before
embarking on it is this something we want to do? Seems like a good thing to
me, please comment if you have an opinion.

   ...ant

[1] http://apache.markmail.org/message/3y6xumsokuzt4km5
[2] http://apache.markmail.org/message/unubgkqdcwwch66m
[3] http://apache.markmail.org/message/2zot3buemcb5wg4a