You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Chesnay Schepler (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/18 16:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-15458) Add whitelist for ambiguous config
options
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Chesnay Schepler closed FLINK-15458.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
master:
7be292cdc70cffbdd3d57ec65019e2593a248738
6825dbdf5cf89e47e4a109b775e91338cfabf08d
> Add whitelist for ambiguous config options
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-15458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15458
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation, Runtime / Configuration
> Reporter: Chesnay Schepler
> Assignee: Chesnay Schepler
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The {{ConfigOptionsDocsCompletenessITCase}} verifies that all existing and documented options are well-defined; as in that for any key there is exactly 1 default and description present, globally.
>
> There is one use-case however where this check is too strict: reporters. These only work with key suffixes (like "port") and hence are failing this check. As a result we don't use the generator mechanism for reporters, which is unfortunate.
>
> I propose to slightly extend this test so that this check is not performed for specific keys.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)