You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomee.apache.org by Laird Nelson <lj...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/01 19:36:02 UTC
JPA 2.0 and Java EE 6: all at once? In pieces?
Hello; I'm wondering what the community's approach is going to be to bring
OpenEJB 3.1.x up to Java EE 6 compliance (in the realm of the EJB container
at least).
I am asking not because I feel I'm owed anything but because it sure would
be great if, at a minimum, javax.persistence were brought up to 2.0 level.
Is there a plan for how OpenEJB 3.1 will move towards Java EE 6 compliance?
May I lobby for JPA 2.0 first, even if, for example, things like
PersistenceUnitInfo.getValidationMode() return NONE to start?
Thanks,
Laird
Re: JPA 2.0 and Java EE 6: all at once? In pieces?
Posted by Laird Nelson <lj...@gmail.com>.
Great; thanks.
Best,
Laird
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <
lfpg.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's already a roadmap for EJB 3.1 at
> http://openejb.apache.org/ejb-31-roadmap.html
> Persistence is handled by OpenJPA, and it's already about to release
> OpenJPA 2.0 beta2, so it'll probably be the first implemented part of Java
> EE 6.
>
> Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
>
> > Hello; I'm wondering what the community's approach is going to be to
> bring
> > OpenEJB 3.1.x up to Java EE 6 compliance (in the realm of the EJB
> container
> > at least).
> >
> > I am asking not because I feel I'm owed anything but because it sure
> would
> > be great if, at a minimum, javax.persistence were brought up to 2.0
> level.
> >
> > Is there a plan for how OpenEJB 3.1 will move towards Java EE 6
> compliance?
> >
> > May I lobby for JPA 2.0 first, even if, for example, things like
> > PersistenceUnitInfo.getValidationMode() return NONE to start?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Laird
> >
>
Re: JPA 2.0 and Java EE 6: all at once? In pieces?
Posted by Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez <lf...@gmail.com>.
There's already a roadmap for EJB 3.1 at http://openejb.apache.org/ejb-31-roadmap.html
Persistence is handled by OpenJPA, and it's already about to release OpenJPA 2.0 beta2, so it'll probably be the first implemented part of Java EE 6.
Luis Fernando Planella Gonzalez
> Hello; I'm wondering what the community's approach is going to be to bring
> OpenEJB 3.1.x up to Java EE 6 compliance (in the realm of the EJB container
> at least).
>
> I am asking not because I feel I'm owed anything but because it sure would
> be great if, at a minimum, javax.persistence were brought up to 2.0 level.
>
> Is there a plan for how OpenEJB 3.1 will move towards Java EE 6 compliance?
>
> May I lobby for JPA 2.0 first, even if, for example, things like
> PersistenceUnitInfo.getValidationMode() return NONE to start?
>
> Thanks,
> Laird
>