You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Boni Gopalan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/10/06 03:53:44 UTC

[jira] Reopened: (JCR-1784) OCM:The UUID of the collection elements changes on update.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Boni Gopalan reopened JCR-1784:
-------------------------------


> OCM:The UUID of the collection elements changes on update.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCR-1784
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1784
>             Project: Jackrabbit
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5
>            Reporter: Boni Gopalan
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>         Attachments: JCR-1784.bonigopalan.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 3h
>  Remaining Estimate: 3h
>
> On ocm.update transaction, the  Current implementation of DefaultCollectionConverterImpl recreates the colleciton-element nodes if there is no id field specificaiton.  This is completely valid for majority of the cases.  But I came across a case where the colleciton element has a uuid field.  In this case also what is happening with the current implementation is that it drops all the elements from the old collection-elements and recreates the new ones.  The major flip side is that now I am left with brand new UUIDs.  I think we should address the uniqueness characteristics specified through UUID also while mapping colleciton elements.
> I have a patch and a TestCase to verify the same.  I have implemented it only for the digester.  If people feel the approach is right I will work out an annotation based testcase as well.  I do not think it is going to fail even with annotations.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.