You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com> on 2015/12/19 03:22:10 UTC
facet component and uninverted field
I recently saw that the new JSON Facet API supports controlling the facet
method that is used and was wondering if there was any support for doing
the same thing in the original facet component?
Also is there a plan to deprecate one of these components over the other or
is there an expectation that both will continue to live on? Curious if I
should bite the bullet and transition to the new JSON Facet API or not.
Re: facet component and uninverted field
Posted by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, the issue I'm having is that there is no equivalent to method uif
for the standard facet component. We'll see how SOLR-8096 shakes out.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015, at 01:32 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> > For those interested I've attached an initial patch to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096 to start supporting uif
> > in
> > FacetComponent via JSON facet api.
> > On Dec 18, 2015 9:22 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I recently saw that the new JSON Facet API supports controlling the
> facet
> > > method that is used and was wondering if there was any support for
> doing
> > > the same thing in the original facet component?
> > >
> > > Also is there a plan to deprecate one of these components over the
> other
> > > or is there an expectation that both will continue to live on?
> Curious if
> > > I should bite the bullet and transition to the new JSON Facet API or
> not.
>
> facet.method specifies the method for faceting! But I suspect you've
> found that already.
>
> As to deprecation, these sort of things in my experience don't get
> deprecated as such, we just find that one gets better than the other -
> the better it gets, the more adoption it sees.
>
> Upayavira
>
Re: facet component and uninverted field
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015, at 01:32 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> For those interested I've attached an initial patch to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096 to start supporting uif
> in
> FacetComponent via JSON facet api.
> On Dec 18, 2015 9:22 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I recently saw that the new JSON Facet API supports controlling the facet
> > method that is used and was wondering if there was any support for doing
> > the same thing in the original facet component?
> >
> > Also is there a plan to deprecate one of these components over the other
> > or is there an expectation that both will continue to live on? Curious if
> > I should bite the bullet and transition to the new JSON Facet API or not.
facet.method specifies the method for faceting! But I suspect you've
found that already.
As to deprecation, these sort of things in my experience don't get
deprecated as such, we just find that one gets better than the other -
the better it gets, the more adoption it sees.
Upayavira
Re: facet component and uninverted field
Posted by Jamie Johnson <je...@gmail.com>.
For those interested I've attached an initial patch to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096 to start supporting uif in
FacetComponent via JSON facet api.
On Dec 18, 2015 9:22 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I recently saw that the new JSON Facet API supports controlling the facet
> method that is used and was wondering if there was any support for doing
> the same thing in the original facet component?
>
> Also is there a plan to deprecate one of these components over the other
> or is there an expectation that both will continue to live on? Curious if
> I should bite the bullet and transition to the new JSON Facet API or not.
>