You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de> on 2013/03/05 11:25:15 UTC
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Hi,
The vote passes with the following result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Tommaso Teofili
+1 Peter Klügl
No other votes were received.
Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and
for investing so much time :-)
I will proceed with the checklist:
http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
documentation?
Peter
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@apache.org>.
If there are no objections, I will commit the changes for the website
since they are not really invasive and fulfill their purpose.
Has anyone an idea why
http://uima.apache.org/d/textmarker-current/tools.textmarker.book.html
is not accessible?
Peter
On 06.03.2013 15:03, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>>>
>>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>>>
>>>> No other votes were received.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
>>>> and for
>>>> investing so much time :-)
>>>>
>>>> I will proceed with the checklist:
>>>> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>>>
>>>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download
>>>> and
>>>> documentation?
>>> Yes, it should have this :-)
>>>
>>> I suggest the documentation go on the website under
>>> docs/d/textmarker-current/
>>> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
>>> release, but
>>> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in
>>> several places.
>>> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
>>> but given
>>> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
>>> me it could
>>> have somewhat more prominence.
>>
>> I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
>> new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
>> available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order
>> to publish the /d/ stuff?
>>
>> About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a
>> link between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the
>> left navigation menu.
>>
>>
>>> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
>>> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
>>> generated things
>>> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>>>
>>> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
>>> and the
>>> pending release of individual add-ons.
>>>
>>> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
>>> but has 1
>>> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
>>> date was put
>>> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
>>> rows in the
>>> box all might have different release dates).
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
>>
>> I will take a look at it now :-)
>
> Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
>
> Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am
> abusing the version parameter. The xml elements have additional
> attributes and the script adds the html elements dependent on their
> existence. For textmarker, there is now not a table for a release
> version, but for all versions of the component.
>
> Here's the download page:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
> ... and the main site with the textmarker link:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
>
> If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send
> an announce mail.
>
> Peter
>
>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
I have an idea.
I've done an experiment to "confirm", which will take maybe an hour... If
confirmed, it's an infra issue and I'll post a Jira. Otherwise, I'll ask about
it on the infra list.
The thing I'm guessing is happening is that some part of the "rsync" system that
was set up prior to the current method of pub/sub publishing didn't get quite
shut off, and/or the pubsub is excluding the docs/d directory.
I removed a silly index.html file in the old pub spot on people.a.o, and if it
disappears in an hour or so on the website, this will confirm that the rsynch is
still running...
-Marshall
On 3/7/2013 6:33 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> If there are no objections, I will commit the changes for the website
> since they are not really invasive and fulfill their purpose.
>
> Has anyone an idea why
> http://uima.apache.org/d/textmarker-current/tools.textmarker.book.html
> is not accessible?
>
> Peter
>
>
> On 06.03.2013 15:03, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>>> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>>>>
>>>>> No other votes were received.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
>>>>> and for
>>>>> investing so much time :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> I will proceed with the checklist:
>>>>> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download
>>>>> and
>>>>> documentation?
>>>> Yes, it should have this :-)
>>>>
>>>> I suggest the documentation go on the website under
>>>> docs/d/textmarker-current/
>>>> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
>>>> release, but
>>>> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in
>>>> several places.
>>>> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
>>>> but given
>>>> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
>>>> me it could
>>>> have somewhat more prominence.
>>> I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
>>> new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
>>> available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order
>>> to publish the /d/ stuff?
>>>
>>> About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a
>>> link between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the
>>> left navigation menu.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
>>>> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
>>>> generated things
>>>> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>>>>
>>>> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
>>>> and the
>>>> pending release of individual add-ons.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
>>>> but has 1
>>>> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
>>>> date was put
>>>> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
>>>> rows in the
>>>> box all might have different release dates).
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
>>> I will take a look at it now :-)
>> Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
>>
>> Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am
>> abusing the version parameter. The xml elements have additional
>> attributes and the script adds the html elements dependent on their
>> existence. For textmarker, there is now not a table for a release
>> version, but for all versions of the component.
>>
>> Here's the download page:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
>> ... and the main site with the textmarker link:
>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
>>
>> If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send
>> an announce mail.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>> -Marshall
>>>>> Peter
>>>>>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
If there are no objections, I will commit the changes for the website
since they are not really invasive and fulfill their purpose.
Has anyone an idea why
http://uima.apache.org/d/textmarker-current/tools.textmarker.book.html
is not accessible?
Peter
On 06.03.2013 15:03, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>>>
>>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>>>
>>>> No other votes were received.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
>>>> and for
>>>> investing so much time :-)
>>>>
>>>> I will proceed with the checklist:
>>>> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>>>
>>>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download
>>>> and
>>>> documentation?
>>> Yes, it should have this :-)
>>>
>>> I suggest the documentation go on the website under
>>> docs/d/textmarker-current/
>>> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
>>> release, but
>>> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in
>>> several places.
>>> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
>>> but given
>>> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
>>> me it could
>>> have somewhat more prominence.
>>
>> I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
>> new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
>> available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order
>> to publish the /d/ stuff?
>>
>> About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a
>> link between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the
>> left navigation menu.
>>
>>
>>> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
>>> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
>>> generated things
>>> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>>>
>>> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
>>> and the
>>> pending release of individual add-ons.
>>>
>>> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
>>> but has 1
>>> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
>>> date was put
>>> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
>>> rows in the
>>> box all might have different release dates).
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
>>
>> I will take a look at it now :-)
>
> Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
>
> Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am
> abusing the version parameter. The xml elements have additional
> attributes and the script adds the html elements dependent on their
> existence. For textmarker, there is now not a table for a release
> version, but for all versions of the component.
>
> Here's the download page:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
> ... and the main site with the textmarker link:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
>
> If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send
> an announce mail.
>
> Peter
>
>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
> On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>>
>>> +1 Marshall Schor
>>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>>
>>> No other votes were received.
>>>
>>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
>>> and for
>>> investing so much time :-)
>>>
>>> I will proceed with the checklist:
>>> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>>
>>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
>>> documentation?
>> Yes, it should have this :-)
>>
>> I suggest the documentation go on the website under
>> docs/d/textmarker-current/
>> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
>> release, but
>> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several
>> places.
>> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
>> but given
>> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
>> me it could
>> have somewhat more prominence.
>
> I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
> new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
> available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order to
> publish the /d/ stuff?
>
> About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a link
> between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the left
> navigation menu.
>
>
>> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
>> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
>> generated things
>> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>>
>> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
>> and the
>> pending release of individual add-ons.
>>
>> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
>> but has 1
>> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
>> date was put
>> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
>> rows in the
>> box all might have different release dates).
>>
>> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
>
> I will take a look at it now :-)
Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am abusing
the version parameter. The xml elements have additional attributes and
the script adds the html elements dependent on their existence. For
textmarker, there is now not a table for a release version, but for all
versions of the component.
Here's the download page:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
... and the main site with the textmarker link:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send an
announce mail.
Peter
>
> Peter
>
>> -Marshall
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>
>> No other votes were received.
>>
>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for
>> investing so much time :-)
>>
>> I will proceed with the checklist: http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>
>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
>> documentation?
> Yes, it should have this :-)
>
> I suggest the documentation go on the website under docs/d/textmarker-current/
> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current release, but
> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several places.
> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items, but given
> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to me it could
> have somewhat more prominence.
I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the new
page and to other locations, but the documentation is not available. Did
I miss something? Do I need to do something in order to publish the /d/
stuff?
About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a link
between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the left
navigation menu.
> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The generated things
> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>
> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker and the
> pending release of individual add-ons.
>
> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one but has 1
> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release date was put
> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the rows in the
> box all might have different release dates).
>
> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
I will take a look at it now :-)
Peter
> -Marshall
>>
>> Peter
>>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Re: the download: the only thing to download in this release is the
source-release.zip, I think (since we're not releasing the binary zip/tar
assemblies at this time). The other artifacts are released to Maven Central.
-Marshall
On 3/5/2013 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote:
> On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>
>> No other votes were received.
>>
>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for
>> investing so much time :-)
>>
>> I will proceed with the checklist: http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>
>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
>> documentation?
> Yes, it should have this :-)
>
> I suggest the documentation go on the website under docs/d/textmarker-current/
> (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current release, but
> sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several places.
> It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items, but given
> its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to me it could
> have somewhat more prominence.
>
> The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
> combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The generated things
> come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
>
> It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker and the
> pending release of individual add-ons.
>
> I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one but has 1
> more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release date was put
> in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the rows in the
> box all might have different release dates).
>
> Let me know if you need help with doing this.
>
> -Marshall
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote passes with the following result:
>
> +1 Marshall Schor
> +1 Tommaso Teofili
> +1 Peter Klügl
>
> No other votes were received.
>
> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for
> investing so much time :-)
>
> I will proceed with the checklist: http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>
> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
> documentation?
Yes, it should have this :-)
I suggest the documentation go on the website under docs/d/textmarker-current/
(we normally have the website accessible docs for the current release, but
sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several places.
It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items, but given
its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to me it could
have somewhat more prominence.
The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The generated things
come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker and the
pending release of individual add-ons.
I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one but has 1
more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release date was put
in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the rows in the
box all might have different release dates).
Let me know if you need help with doing this.
-Marshall
>
>
> Peter
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
On 3/5/2013 9:58 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> I will replace the update site in release/uima, right?
>
> Just asking in order to avoid mistakes on my side.
We're all learning here :-). But, yes, that is my understanding.
-Marshall
>
> Peter
>
> On 05.03.2013 11:25, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The vote passes with the following result:
>>
>> +1 Marshall Schor
>> +1 Tommaso Teofili
>> +1 Peter Klügl
>>
>> No other votes were received.
>>
>> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for
>> investing so much time :-)
>>
>> I will proceed with the checklist: http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>>
>> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
>> documentation?
>>
>>
>> Peter
>
>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache UIMA TextMarker RC6 AND Composite Repository
Posted by Peter Klügl <pk...@uni-wuerzburg.de>.
I will replace the update site in release/uima, right?
Just asking in order to avoid mistakes on my side.
Peter
On 05.03.2013 11:25, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote passes with the following result:
>
> +1 Marshall Schor
> +1 Tommaso Teofili
> +1 Peter Klügl
>
> No other votes were received.
>
> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and
> for investing so much time :-)
>
> I will proceed with the checklist:
> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
>
> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download
> and documentation?
>
>
> Peter