You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by "Oleg Ignatenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/18 18:03:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (IGNITE-9316) Analyse and improve code coverage in
ML module (follow-up to IGNITE-9146)
Oleg Ignatenko created IGNITE-9316:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Analyse and improve code coverage in ML module (follow-up to IGNITE-9146)
Key: IGNITE-9316
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9316
Project: Ignite
Issue Type: Task
Components: ml
Affects Versions: 2.6
Reporter: Oleg Ignatenko
Studying of coverage reports attached in IGNITE-9146 suggests that many default methods in interfaces are not covered by tests.
In particular the default methods in the following interfaces look like worth covering in tests:
{noformat}
org.apache.ignite.ml.Model
org.apache.ignite.ml.math.functions.IgniteTriFunction
org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.PartitionDataBuilder
org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.PartitionContextBuilder
org.apache.ignite.ml.dataset.Dataset
org.apache.ignite.ml.environment.parallelism.Promise
org.apache.ignite.ml.composition.predictionsaggregator.PredictionsAggregator{noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)