[jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-625) Java/Scala package names in ASF context

["Roman Shaposhnik (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17646298#comment-17646298 ] 

Roman Shaposhnik commented on LEGAL-625:
----------------------------------------

Can this be closed/resolved now?

> Java/Scala package names in ASF context
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LEGAL-625
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-625
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: J-L
>            Priority: Major
>
> As per threads:
>  # [https://lists.apache.org/thread/cjo86gdwvqlqslq68gd0c8hxq6ds6yrz]
>  # [https://lists.apache.org/thread/5vw58s7x9gzkt9h627xv705j32fxljc9]
> We're discussing within the Apache Pekko community, which Java/Scala packages names to use.
> The discussion is between:
>  # _pekko_ short and aligns with the project's previous package name style
>  # _org.apache.pekko_ longer, but in line with the ASF conventions.
> Note: Maven org/group ID is not at discussion, so will be _org.apache.pekko_
> Part of the discussion ends up wondering whether using option 1 will cause trouble later down the road, for intermediate incubator releases or even graduation. We certainly don't want to land in a situation where we need a rename 2 years from now.
> During the discussion it was brought up that there might be legal or trademark hurdles, which leads to raising the issue here.
> If there's a risk at veto's there's not much point in discussing it further.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org