You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "moritz löser (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/14 14:14:06 UTC

[jira] [Created] (CAMEL-9222) Aggreagator breaks onCompletion semantic if used with parallelProcessing

moritz löser created CAMEL-9222:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Aggreagator breaks onCompletion semantic if used with parallelProcessing
                 Key: CAMEL-9222
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9222
             Project: Camel
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: camel-core
    Affects Versions: 2.14.3
            Reporter: moritz löser


If using onCompletion (or Routepolicy.onExchangeDone) in a route that splits and aggregates onCompletion is called on original exchange before any exchange is consumed if parallelProcessing() is set on aggregator definition.

I created a unit test with a simple route. the tests checks the order of calls on the mocks. the call on finish should be last (just (un)comment parallelProcessing to see the effect):

{code:java}
package de.ml;

import static org.mockito.Matchers.any;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.atLeastOnce;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.doAnswer;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.inOrder;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.when;

import java.util.Arrays;
import java.util.UUID;

import org.apache.camel.CamelContext;
import org.apache.camel.Exchange;
import org.apache.camel.Processor;
import org.apache.camel.RoutesBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
import org.apache.camel.component.direct.DirectEndpoint;
import org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint;
import org.apache.camel.impl.DefaultCamelContext;
import org.apache.camel.processor.aggregate.AggregationStrategy;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.InOrder;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.invocation.InvocationOnMock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import org.mockito.stubbing.Answer;

@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class TestAggregator {
    private static final String SIZE = "size";
    private static final String ID = "id";
    private final CamelContext context = new DefaultCamelContext();
    @Mock
    private Processor mockProcessor;

    @Mock
    private Processor mockHeaderProcessor;

    @Mock
    private AggregationStrategy mockAggregator;

    @Mock
    private Processor onFinishMock;
    private DirectEndpoint trigger;
    private MockEndpoint out;

    @Before
    public void prepareMocks() throws Exception {
        when( mockAggregator.aggregate( any( Exchange.class ), any( Exchange.class ) ) ).then(
            new Answer<Exchange>() {

                @Override
                public Exchange answer( InvocationOnMock invocation ) throws Throwable {
                    // always just return old exchange
                    return (Exchange) invocation.getArguments()[1];
                }
            } );
        doAnswer( new Answer<Void>() {

            @Override
            public Void answer( InvocationOnMock invocation ) throws Throwable {
                Exchange exchange = (Exchange) invocation.getArguments()[0];
                exchange.getIn().setHeader( ID, UUID.randomUUID() );
                exchange.getIn().setHeader( SIZE, 1 );
                return null;
            }
        } ).when( mockHeaderProcessor ).process( any( Exchange.class ) );
    }

    @Test
    public void testRoute() throws Exception {
        trigger = context.getEndpoint( "direct:trigger", DirectEndpoint.class );
        out = context.getEndpoint( "mock:out", MockEndpoint.class );
        RoutesBuilder testObject = getTestObject();
        context.addRoutes( testObject );
        out.expectedMessageCount( 3 );
        context.start();
        context.createProducerTemplate().sendBody( trigger, Arrays.asList( "1a", "1b", "2c" ) );
        out.assertIsSatisfied();
        InOrder order = inOrder( mockHeaderProcessor, mockProcessor, onFinishMock );
        order.verify( mockHeaderProcessor, atLeastOnce() ).process( any( Exchange.class ) );
        order.verify( mockProcessor, atLeastOnce() ).process( any( Exchange.class ) );
        order.verify( onFinishMock ).process( any( Exchange.class ) );

    }

    private RouteBuilder getTestObject() {
        return new RouteBuilder() {

            @Override
            public void configure() throws Exception {
                from(trigger)
                    .onCompletion().process(onFinishMock).end()
                    .split().body()
                    .process(mockHeaderProcessor)
                    .aggregate(header(ID), mockAggregator)
                    .completionSize(header(SIZE))
                    //.parallelProcessing()
                    .process(mockProcessor)
                    .to(out);
            }
        };
    }
}
{code}

Imho switching parallelProcessing() shouldn't have impact on when exchange is complete?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)