You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@datafu.apache.org by "jian wang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/23 05:32:42 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (DATAFU-21) Probability weighted sampling without reservoir

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-21?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13944325#comment-13944325 ] 

jian wang commented on DATAFU-21:
---------------------------------

Some investigation updates:

Based on the theories from paper: http://utopia.duth.gr/~pefraimi/research/data/2007EncOfAlg.pdf, I plan to associate each item with a key X(j) = 1 - pow(U, 1/w(j)), U is a random variable between (0,1). Then follow the thought of Random Sort, we sort the items in ascending order based on X(j) and select the smallest k = p * n items.

Also as simple random sampling algorithm, we could also consider the possibility of rejecting items applying Maurer's lemma and accepting items applying Bernstein's lemma.

Apply Maurer's lemma:

we would like to find 0<q1<1, so that we reject items whose  key is greater than q1.

let Y(j) = 1 if (X(j) < q1)
           =  0 otherwise

{Y(j), j = 1 to n} are independent random variables.

E(Y(j)) = Pr(X(j) < q1) * 1 + Pr(X(j) >= q1) * 0
            = Pr(1 - pow( U, 1/w(j) ) < q1)
            = Pr(1 - q1 < pow( U, 1/w(j) ))
            = Pr(pow(1 - q1, w(j) ) < U) = 1 - pow( 1 - q1, w(j) )

E(Y(j) ^ 2) = E(Y(j)) = 1 - pow(1 - q1, w(j) )

set Y = sum(Y(j), j = 1 to n),  

      Q1 = sum( pow( 1-q1, w(j) ) , j = 1 to n)

E(Y) = sum(E(Y(j))) = n - sum( pow( 81-q1, w(j) ) ) = n - Q1

apply Maurer's lemma with t = (1 - p) * n - sum( pow(1 - q1, w(j) ) ) = (1 - p) * n - Q1, I get  
        Q1  >= n * (1 - p) + log(err) + sqrt( log(err) * (log(err) - 2 * n * p) )     (1)

we could get q1 by solving (1)

Apply Berstein's lemma:

similar to applying Maurer's lemma, we could get a q2 so that we could accept item whose key is smaller than q2, 0 <= q2 <= 1.

let  Z(j) = 1 if X(j) < q2, 
            = 0 if X(j) >= q2

{Z(j), j = 1 to n} are independent random variables.

E(Z(j)) = Pr(X(j) < q2) * 1 + Pr(X(j) >= q2) *  0
           = Pr(1 - pow( U, 1/w(j) ) < q2)
           = 1 - pow(1 - q2, w(j) )

E(Z(j) ^ 2) = E(Z(j))

Z(j) - E(Z(j)) <= 1 - E(Z(j)) = pow(1 - q2, w(j) ) <= 1 = M

theta(j) ^ 2 = E(Z(j) ^ 2) - E(Z(j)) ^ 2 <= E(Z(j) ^ 2) = 1 - pow(1 - q2, w(j) )

set Z = sum(Z(j),  j = 1 to n)

      Q2 = sum( pow(1 - q2, w(j) ) )

      E(Z) = sum(E(Z(j)), j = 1 to n) = n - sum( pow(1 - q2, w(j) ) ) = n - Q2

apply Berstein's lemma with t = sum( pow(1 - q2, w(j) ) ) - (1 - p) * n = Q2 -  (1 - p) * n, I get  
    Q2  >= n * (1 - p) + 2 / 3 * log(err)  + 2 / 3 * sqrt( log(err) * (log(err) - 9 * n * p / 2 ) )     (2)

we could get q2 by solving (2)

Questions:

(1) Please help comment on the above approach. Do they overall make sense? 

(2) I am stuck in getting q1 and q2 by solving (1) and (2) respectively. Would like to seek some advice on it. 

> Probability weighted sampling without reservoir
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DATAFU-21
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DATAFU-21
>             Project: DataFu
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>         Environment: Mac OS, Linux
>            Reporter: jian wang
>            Assignee: jian wang
>
> This issue is used to track investigation on finding a weighted sampler without using internal reservoir. 
> At present, the SimpleRandomSample has implemented a good acceptance-rejection sampling algo on probability random sampling. The weighted sampler could utilize the simple random sample with slight modification.
> One slight modification is:  the present simple random sample generates a uniform random number lies between (0, 1) as the random variable to accept or reject an item. The weighted sample may generate this random variable based on the item's weight and this random number still lies between (0, 1) and each item's random variable remain independent between each other.
> Need further think and experiment the correctness of this solution and how to implement it in an effective way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)