[jira] [Commented] (YARN-387) Fix inconsistent protocol naming

["Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13573206#comment-13573206 ] 

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli commented on YARN-387:
----------------------------------------------

I propose we do the following conversions:

Main protocols:
 - client_RM_protocol.proto -> client_rm_protocol.proto
 - AM_RM_protocol.proto - > am_rm_protocol.proto
 - container_manager.proto -> am_nm_protocol.proto
 - ResourceTracker.proto -> rm_nm_protocol.proto
 - LocalizationProtocol.proto -> nm_localizer_protocol.proto
 - RMAdminProtocol.proto -> rm_admin_protocol.proto

Misc:
 - yarnprototunnelrpc.proto -> yarn_rpc_tunnel_protos.proto

In addition, we should
 - similarly rename all the java API classes backing the above protocols
 - add comments to all the proto files description as to what they do and can contain.

Thoughts?
                
> Fix inconsistent protocol naming
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-387
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>            Assignee: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>
> We now have different and inconsistent naming schemes for various protocols. It was hard to explain to users, mainly in direct interactions at talks/presentations and user group meetings, with such naming.
> We should fix these before we go beta. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira