You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Yanbo Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/15 11:21:25 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-14657) RFormula output wrong features when
formula w/o intercept
Yanbo Liang created SPARK-14657:
-----------------------------------
Summary: RFormula output wrong features when formula w/o intercept
Key: SPARK-14657
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14657
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ML
Reporter: Yanbo Liang
SparkR::glm output different features compared with R glm.
SparkR::glm
{quote}
training <- suppressWarnings(createDataFrame(sqlContext, iris))
model <- glm(Sepal_Width ~ Sepal_Length + Species - 1, data = training)
summary(model)
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
Sepal_Length 0.67468 0.0093013 72.536 0
Species_versicolor -1.2349 0.07269 -16.989 0
Species_virginica -1.4708 0.077397 -19.003 0
{quote}
stats::glm
{quote}
summary(glm(Sepal.Width ~ Sepal.Length + Species - 1, data = iris))
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
Sepal.Length 0.3499 0.0463 7.557 4.19e-12 ***
Speciessetosa 1.6765 0.2354 7.123 4.46e-11 ***
Speciesversicolor 0.6931 0.2779 2.494 0.0137 *
Speciesvirginica 0.6690 0.3078 2.174 0.0313 *
{quote}
The encoder for feature of string type is difference. R did not drop any category but SparkR drop the last one.
I refer R documents and search online, found when we fit a R glm model(or other models powered by R formula) w/o intercept on a dataset which including string/category features, one of the levels in the first category feature is being used as reference level, we will not drop any category for that feature.
I think we should keep consistent sementics for Spark RFormula.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org