You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/08/28 03:23:58 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (TAP5-970) AssetSource should use more aggresive
caching
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship closed TAP5-970.
-------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
> AssetSource should use more aggresive caching
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-970
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-970
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.2
> Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: bulk-close-candidate
>
> I'm increasingly finding myself writing code that uses AssetSource to obtain assets on-the-fly as part of a component's rendering. Looking at the code, this does not appear to be exceptionally efficient, as Resources (along with the associated disk file I/o) must be created and localized before a (cached) Asset instance can be identified.
> A memoization approach, where method names and method parameters to AssetSource are used to as a cache key, should yield better performance.
> As I remember, there was a discussion on the mailing list about too much time being spent inside AssetSource.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)