You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ruleqa@spamassassin.apache.org by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com> on 2013/05/26 15:28:47 UTC
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2013-05-26
On 5/26/2013 5:00 AM, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>
> 20130525: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20130525
> 20130525: Spam: 141158, Ham: 173763
Rule generation is correct but the counts are off just to clarify the whys. From checking the logs, here's why would couldn't generate:
HAM: 211134 (150000 required)
SPAM: 143070 (150000 required)
Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting.
Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example
Regards,
KAM
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2013-05-26
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 05/26/2013 03:28 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 5/26/2013 5:00 AM, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>>
>> 20130525: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20130525
>> 20130525: Spam: 141158, Ham: 173763
>
> Rule generation is correct but the counts are off just to clarify the
> whys. From checking the logs, here's why would couldn't generate:
>
> HAM: 211134 (150000 required)
> SPAM: 143070 (150000 required)
>
> Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting.
> Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example
Weird!!!!
my generic corpus alone had:
status: completed scan stage, 131348 messages now: 2013-05-25
11:56:53
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2013-05-26
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 05/29/2013 02:09 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 5/28/2013 8:17 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>> Looking through the lists, I don't see my spam or ham corpus listed.
>> It's generating every day, with about 1459 spams and 14789 hams. The
>> script runs at 04:00 US Central time, or 23:00 UTC, and takes 28
>> minutes for a nightly or 69 minutes for a weekly -net run. Am I
>> submitting them outside the window? Do I need to adjust the time I run
>> my masschecks?
>
> I think the weekly net failed is why we are failing all the subsequent
> and sadly I don't know the windows for it but I would back it up one
> hour and see.
iirc, you should deliver the masscheck logs AFTER 9am GMT
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2013-05-26
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com>.
On 5/28/2013 8:17 AM, Daniel McDonald wrote:
> Looking through the lists, I don't see my spam or ham corpus listed.
> It's generating every day, with about 1459 spams and 14789 hams. The
> script runs at 04:00 US Central time, or 23:00 UTC, and takes 28
> minutes for a nightly or 69 minutes for a weekly -net run. Am I
> submitting them outside the window? Do I need to adjust the time I run
> my masschecks?
I think the weekly net failed is why we are failing all the subsequent
and sadly I don't know the windows for it but I would back it up one
hour and see.
Re: Rule updates are too old - 2013-05-26
Posted by Daniel McDonald <da...@austinenergy.com>.
On 5/26/13 8:28 AM, "Kevin McGrail" <KM...@PCCC.com> wrote:
> On 5/26/2013 5:00 AM, darxus@chaosreigns.com wrote:
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>> SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since 2013-05-25.
>>
>> 20130525: Spam or ham is below threshold of 150,000:
>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20130525
>> 20130525: Spam: 141158, Ham: 173763
>
> Rule generation is correct but the counts are off just to clarify the whys.
> From checking the logs, here's why would couldn't generate:
>
> HAM: 211134 (150000 required)
> SPAM: 143070 (150000 required)
>
> Insufficient spam corpus to generate scores; aborting.
> Exit Status 9 is not zero for do-nightly-rescore-example
Looking through the lists, I don't see my spam or ham corpus listed. It's
generating every day, with about 1459 spams and 14789 hams. The script runs
at 04:00 US Central time, or 23:00 UTC, and takes 28 minutes for a nightly
or 69 minutes for a weekly -net run. Am I submitting them outside the
window? Do I need to adjust the time I run my masschecks?
>
> Regards,
> KAM
>
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281