You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Rishabh Maurya (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/03 12:44:34 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-2178) Lucene index boosting on certain
fields
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14194460#comment-14194460 ]
Rishabh Maurya edited comment on OAK-2178 at 11/3/14 11:44 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Patch contains fix for configuring field boosting from property definition node of lucene index.
Field boosting can be specified in following way -
{code}
{
"test": {
"includePropertyNames": [
"foo"
],
"properties": {
"foo": {
"type": "Long",
"fieldBoost": 2.0
}
}
}
}
{code}
NOTE : Field Boosting currently applicable on fulltext fields only
was (Author: maurya):
Patch contains fix for configuring field boosting from property definition node of lucene index.
Field boosting can be specified in following way -
{code}
{
"test": {
"includePropertyNames": [
"foo"
],
"properties": {
"foo": {
"type": "Long",
"fieldBoosting": 2.0
}
}
}
}
{code}
NOTE : Field Boosting currently applicable on fulltext fields only
> Lucene index boosting on certain fields
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2178
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2178
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: oak-lucene
> Affects Versions: 1.1.0
> Reporter: Tommaso Teofili
> Attachments: OAK-2178.patch
>
>
> In JR2 it was possible to manually set configuration specific boost factors at index time (see http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/IndexingConfiguration) and it would be good to introduce the possibility of doing that in the query index configuration of the Oak Lucene index too.
> That would ease definition of a more accurate scoring mechanism, depending on the use case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)