Requirements (was Re: [VOTE] Move s:form to tomahawk)

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

One thing we should also avoid is PITA stuff like

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-541

-Matt

On 7/14/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I was thinking about the requirements last days, when worked with
> > Shale-Test and JMock.
> >
> > I noticed that there are only some tests for components in Tomahawk.
> > Wouldn't it be great to have a test-case as a requirement for
> > promoting a component ?
>
> Sure, if we can decide what reasonable test cases are.
>
>
> > And of course, Mike is right in *testing* with RI and example.
>
> Note that I don't think that the component necessarily has to work
> with the RI to be promoted.   But the documentation for the component
> should state whether it's expected to work with the RI or not, which
> would be determined by the testing.
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com