You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pig.apache.org by "Russell Jurney (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/12/11 03:43:22 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (PIG-3089) Implicit relation names

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Russell Jurney updated PIG-3089:
--------------------------------

    Description: 
A = load foo;
B = load bar;
filter A by id > 5;
join A_1 by id, B by id;
// or A_filter
foreach A_1_B generate id;
store into foobar; // A_1_B_1 or A_filter_B_generate
Or some such routine?
We don't have to be explicit no more!

  was:
PA = load foo;
B = load bar;
filter A by id > 5;
join A_1 by id, B by id;
// or A_filter
foreach A_1_B generate id;
store into foobar; // A_1_B_1 or A_filter_B_generate
Or some such routine?
We don't have to be explicit no more!

    
> Implicit relation names
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-3089
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3089
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: grunt, parser
>            Reporter: Russell Jurney
>            Assignee: Jonathan Coveney
>
> A = load foo;
> B = load bar;
> filter A by id > 5;
> join A_1 by id, B by id;
> // or A_filter
> foreach A_1_B generate id;
> store into foobar; // A_1_B_1 or A_filter_B_generate
> Or some such routine?
> We don't have to be explicit no more!

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira